Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
03-23-21 02:59PM |
|
MeaghanEdwards
Drawmaster
Registered: Aug 2018
Location:
Posts: 699 |
quote: Originally posted by cnpeters
I don't think you can necessarily count Nancy Martin out either, particularly if they can beat Walker/Muyres later today, which would win her the pool. I mean, they're the last runners up at this thing, and they had to beat Jones/Laing and Shannon Birchard last time to get that far.
That better be the flipping 4:30 game this afternoon.
They'll he getting the featured game. They heard you ;)
Last edited by MeaghanEdwards on 03-23-21 at 03:04PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 03:58PM |
|
cnpeters
Hitting Paint
Registered: Feb 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 167 |
quote: Originally posted by MeaghanEdwards
They'll he getting the featured game. They heard you ;-)
edit - I had to add a nose to your smiley so it wouldn't take up the whole screen
:-) Great!
One of my favorite parts of the Scotties this year was the coverage of the Sasketchewan team. At various points when they were covering team Anderson, they would talk about how the team was put together. And they were very polite in how they said it but it always came down to each individual member saying something like "Nancy took me out drinking and I agreed to join the team."
So I have a soft spot for team Martin, as I have to assume I know how the doubles team came together years ago.
Plus, she's not one of the hot shot professionals, but she's on the edge of "good enough to win it." I mean, at a casino she'd be like 30-1. I'd totally put $100 those odds.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 04:07PM |
|
Bulls Eye
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Mar 2017
Location:
Posts: 80 |
Does anyone know where the teams stand with the LSD? Four teams are already finished at 4-2 but I believe the two with the largest LSD are already eliminated.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 04:14PM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
quote: Originally posted by Bulls Eye
Does anyone know where the teams stand with the LSD? Four teams are already finished at 4-2 but I believe the two with the largest LSD are already eliminated.
https://www.curling.ca/files/2021/03/LSD27.pdf
NL looking good to advance at 4-2 with the best draw total of teams that could finish 4-2
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 04:18PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by Bulls Eye
Does anyone know where the teams stand with the LSD? Four teams are already finished at 4-2 but I believe the two with the largest LSD are already eliminated.
they're on the curling canada site
but i have taken a look at the lsd and compiled a list of the top 12 in order
Peterman/gallant
Einarson/Gushue
Walker/Muyres
Mitchell/Smith
Meilleur/Nichols
Tran/Sluchinski
Sahaidak/Lott
Birchard/Schneider
Karwacki/Samagalski
Jones/Everist
Jones/Laing
Tuck/Tuck
now, obviously some of these dont matter because some of these teams are out. it boed well for birhcard/schneider if they can win their last game because, based off lsd they'd be one of the next 8 best as would weagle and epping
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 05:08PM |
|
cnpeters
Hitting Paint
Registered: Feb 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 167 |
I'm only using the female's names for ease of typing here.. Here's the situation if Walker wins - based on last stone tiebreak for seeding after head to head breaks pool ties...
If Walker wins...
#1 Walker
#2 Peterman
#3 Jones
#4 Schmeimann
Then the last pool winner
#5 Miskew
And the next 7
#6 Einarson
#7 Sahaidak
**#8 Sweeting
#9 Weagle
#10 Mitchell
#11 Tran
#12 Winner of Karwacki v. Birchard
If Sweeting loses, she moves to the bottom, 9-12 move up one, and depending on Sweeting's draw to the button - it's between her and Njegovan for the last spot.
If Walker loses and Martin wins...
#1 Peterman
#2 Jones
#3-4-5 Jones/Schmeimann/Martin based on the Martin team draw to the button today
And the next 7
#6 Einarson
#7 Walker
#8 Sahaidak
**#9 Sweeting
#10 Weagle
#11 Mitchell
#12 Tran
If Sweeting loses, she's out, 10-12 move up one and the winner of Karwacki v. Birchard is #12
At least, I think that's what I've figured out.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 05:20PM |
|
curlingclips
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Oct 2019
Location:
Posts: 1523 |
quote: Originally posted by cnpeters
So I have a soft spot for team Martin, as I have to assume I know how the doubles team came together years ago.
She briefly talked about her partnership with Griffith in the pre-game interview before a crazy game vs Homan/Morris last year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrCoGjnqlJU
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 06:37PM |
|
cnpeters
Hitting Paint
Registered: Feb 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 167 |
quote: Originally posted by cnpeters
I'd totally put $100 those odds.
looks like I’m out $100
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 06:39PM |
|
hogged again
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2019
Location:
Posts: 659 |
Only CC could come up with a playoff scenario where a team that won their group ends up in the same spot as 3rd place teams. Easily avoidable too but I'm sure they had a 10 person committee enjoying a catered meeting while they came up with this joke.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 07:12PM |
|
decade
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 1962 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Thanks for the quick answer. Th
Felt sorry for Kaitlyn & The Kid going down again this a.m. I wonder if Kaitlyn will still be able to re-unite with Superstar Morris for the Olympic Trials or Lang & Stoughton will saddle her up with another relative?
You have been told more than once that Morris and Homan have qualified for the trials. As a team! No Kaitlyn. No Kaitlyn,
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 09:07PM |
|
cnpeters
Hitting Paint
Registered: Feb 2020
Location: Ohio
Posts: 167 |
Val is playing tremendous early, and the Kennedy/Sweeting pair works together like they’ve been doing this for years.
Epping is trying to get Weagle to throw the shots he would throw, and it’s a train wreck.
Epping/Weagle would benefit tremendously by immediately switching epping to 1/5, in my opinion. Epping can skip a great game, but he’s not skipping it for weagle to throw the finishing shot. If he’s not going to do that, he should just throw fifth. Now. In the third end.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 09:30PM |
|
curlingclips
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Oct 2019
Location:
Posts: 1523 |
quote: Originally posted by cnpeters
Kennedy/Sweeting pair works together like they’ve been doing this for years
My theory (no evidence, unfortunately) is that pairing two vices together is best for team dynamics.
The vice in a regular 4-person team tends to be the most diplomatic. It's the bridge between frontend and backend, and they're usually handling measurements and other interactions with opposing team/officials, etc. It's really hard to be a good vice, beyond just athleticism and shooting abilities. They also need to have good understanding of team dynamics, people skills, diplomacy, psychology, etc.
Thus, my theory is that if you put two vices together into a mixed doubles team, you'll probably have pretty good team dynamics almost instantly.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 09:37PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Weagle and epping doing a good job of turning this around. I agree that sometimes the dynamic with them can seem weird but its also obvious that lisa trusts john and really believes what he's saying. ultimately do work well together
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 09:47PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Bit of a mis-match in TSN's feature 1st rd playoff tonite.
Weagle/Epping vs Sweeting/Kennedy
Kennedy a top 3rd (many championship rings) vs. Epping (a top 3rd with limited championship hardware) is about even. Both guys can toss big weight, both guys capable of nuanced shots.
Sweeting vs Lee Weagle is not. Val an established 3rd now with many years of provincial championship acumen vs. the world's greatest lead, who doesn't have the greatest curling mind and will have to be coached up immensely by Epping to even give Val & Mark a decent match. Weagle lucky on end 1 as she dumps her in-turn slash, ticks a long front-guard and only gives up a steal of 2 to Val. Could easily have been 4 if Mark allows any brushing whatsoever.
Birchard vs. Miskew should end up as the feature once Weagle bombs out early.
oh how i love it when you ramble on and make yourself look like an idiot . and boy did you here. well done
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:07PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by fresca
Misty - your like my wife
I guess 20 answers on jeopardy and get one wrong and she laughs at me
Same with antiues roadshow - i guess the value of every object and am often close - im out $10,000 on something and she delights in my error
Ml makes a hundred sometime silly observations - doesnt make him an idiot
You shud pair up with maggie
his observation that this was a mismatch and that he expected this to be a blowout was idiotic. weagle and epping are an experienced and successful mixed doubles team. this was never going to be easy for kennedy and sweeting and anyone with an ounce of common sense would have known that
you're also implying that he is right most of the time and he's not
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:11PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Birchard/Schneider and Sahaidak/Lott the first 2 teams through tonight
2 very dangerous dark horse teams right there
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:16PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Not every match is destined to be a barn-burner. I make bold predictions which most sportscaster and the average fan-mope is unable to muster up the courage to do.
If I was an idiot - I'd be posting much adieu about nothing - like most of you rink rats!
oh dont give that ****. you simply dont respect weagle and epping. you totally undervalued them, in particular lisa. you just assumed she couldnt stand up to val but you were wrong
saying this was going to be a blowout had nothing to do with being bold, it had nothing to do with courage.sweeting and kennedy were the favorites for most. nice try though
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:33PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
well that gushue/einarson v.s tran/sluchinski ending was fun. what a comeback that would have been
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:35PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
that steal of 2 for kennedy/sweeting could turn out to be huge here. they've both done a good job forcing the other team with hammer
Last edited by misty1 on 03-23-21 at 10:37PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:45PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Congrats to john and lisa. great game and recovery after those first 2 ends. i didnt know they've been friends for so long.
Last edited by misty1 on 03-23-21 at 10:51PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 10:50PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Of course I under-valued Lisa. She's the world's greatest lead. Everyone knows that. She's not a banger or doubles machine. Part of making the prediction is taking account of such information.
There is no malice involved. Weagle is a hall of fame player. Her & Epping make for a great team - hope they continue to play and evolve!
you're right, lisa doesnt play a lot of high, hard shots but with the position she throws here she doesnt have to. she'll throw mostly draws and soft weight shots and in that regard she's better than val and it made the matcup tighter
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-23-21 11:12PM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
Not always, but usually, the team with the best female curler wins. Check the stats, check the "analytics". The winning team needs someone who can MAKE the last shot. We will see how it unfolds, but my money is on the ladies who are able to make the LAST SHOT. Go ladies go. Still, Go Peterman Gallant Go
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-24-21 12:07PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
I'll try my hand at picking winners this morning:
Walker/muyres def. Weagle/Epping.
Much as I want to be wrong walker and muyres look very strong here. I dont know if lisa and John are strong enough to stop them
Schneider/birchard def. Morris/schmieman
Sahaidak/Lott def. Peterman/gallant
Jones/laing def. Gushue/einarson
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-24-21 12:29PM |
|
Maggie
Hitting Paint
Registered: Feb 2020
Location:
Posts: 156 |
I’d love to see Sahaidak/Lott win the championship. They’ve been curling together for awhile and their main focus is mixed doubles. It would be nice to see a dedicated team be successful.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
03-24-21 12:31PM |
|
hogged again
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2019
Location:
Posts: 659 |
What is the rule on the hog line? Does the rock have to be released before its front edge reaches the line or does the whole rock have to cross the line for it to be pulled. Maybe my eyes are going but last couple days I swear I've seen rocks not released until they were on top of the line.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
![](https://www.curlingzone.com/images/space.gif) |
All times are GMT. The time now is . |
![Post A Reply](https://www.curlingzone.com/images/reply.gif) |
|
|
|
![](https://www.curlingzone.com/images/space.gif) |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|