Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
01-24-16 08:19PM |
|
decade
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 1962 |
Sweeting and Homan's losses today handed JJ the Scotties on a silver platter.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:24PM |
|
nelski
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Twin Snowbanks
Posts: 2068 |
It is very interesting to look back on who's who on Karla Thompson's team. It is as if BC teams have been sifting themselves to come together and now this is rising to the top. Former Kelly Scott players. Former Darcy Robertson players. Former Georgina Wheatcroft players. Former Kelley Law players. Former Van Osch players. This is not a team from out of nowhere. Seems like a ready to hit the nationals team. Let's see if they can skid past KScott and contend.
__________________
Lots of major youth (<21) events. Nice for Murdoch... and us :-D.
Last edited by nelski on 01-24-16 at 08:49PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:26PM |
|
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668 |
Looks they are flying past Scott!
__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:31PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
this is nuts.homan, scott and sweeting all going down today
think this will happen with the men? i wouldnt mind it..as long as epping wins ontario
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:32PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Jean-michel menard though will be at the brier for Quebec
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:40PM |
|
Rock Your World
Swing Artist
Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 313 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Its only half-time curlerbroad. Kelly has Karla where she wants her - time for 5 ends of nuttin' but pitti-patti
Curlerbroad - shouldn't you be working on your O HANADA sign for the parade?
And you were 95% sure Brown or Van Osch or Scott would win BC
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:51PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
it'll be between Northwest Territories and British Columbia for who qualifies
I am not sure what to think of Karla Thompson's chances at the scotties because she never plays any of these other teams.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 08:55PM |
|
nelski
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Twin Snowbanks
Posts: 2068 |
quote: Originally posted by misty1
it'll be between Northwest Territories and British Columbia for who qualifies.
Oh! Is there still a pre-qual? I thought they'd nuked that dumb idea.
__________________
Lots of major youth (<21) events. Nice for Murdoch... and us :-D.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-24-16 09:10PM |
|
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668 |
quote: Originally posted by Manitoba Legend
Its only half-time curlerbroad. Kelly has Karla where she wants her - time for 5 ends of nuttin' but pitti-patti
Curlerbroad - shouldn't you be working on your O HANADA sign for the parade?
I can't while I feel sad for Ott-Am...but you said it earlier in the week RISE OF THE FAWNS
__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.
Last edited by curlerbroad on 01-24-16 at 09:17PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 09:34AM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Re: 2016 STOH
quote: Originally posted by HotRocks
This year's STOH will be quite the challenge for the TSN crew to analyze all these new faces ( and old back-again faces)..
Team Hanna got the ON spot.. but I don't look forward to their
games of good basic strategy but very average skill..
The fight at the "top" will be between Jones and McCarville
there are good stories here this year. the return of larouche, mccarville and hanna
the break through of einarson
you dont need the top teams there to create an interesting event.these teams here are not nobodies, they arent novices. there are a lot of great teams at the scotties this year this year and it will be pretty competitive. there will be 3 clear favorites but, there isnt this big gap between them and everyone else so its not as assured who the final 4 will be as it usually is
about the only certainty is that jones will be there at the end
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 10:08AM |
|
Cosss
Hitting Paint
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 191 |
Re: Much ado ^^^ as usual..
quote: Originally posted by HotRocks
Team Hanna had the very great luck of having not one but two Teams lose for her eventual win.
Team Harrison was the far superior Team and Team Homan's status is without question.
Team Homan lost a big game.. like they have before and will again at some time
What is lost from the 2016 STOH is Team Homan's great shotmaking
It is possible to win with luck. Maybe a pick that the opposition experiences at a horrible time, or a missed shot that ends up being good after it bounces off a few rocks, but these are rare. I also don't think this is what you are referring to. I think, and correct me if I'm wrong, that what you are saying is that Hannah didn't win. That Homan and Harrison lost.
The last I checked, Hannah was the Ontario champion. She WON because she pressed the other team into lower percentage shots. Shots that even amazingly consistent curlers can't always make. Give credit where it is due. Hannah won that championship and Homan and Harrison lost. Simple really.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 11:17AM |
|
rick8end
Swing Artist
Registered: Nov 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 202 |
If we learned anything from yesterday's games, it's that lots of teams can be competitive and a one-game final is a total equalizer (i.e. anything can happen). My guess is that it will be one of the most competitive Scotties in some time and anyone suggesting that one team has a lock on it didn't learn a thing from yesterday. Taking any sort of credit away from the likes of Hanna and the less-surprising Carey is unfair to both rinks. They came up bigger when it mattered most.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 01:09PM |
|
Russ
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Apr 2015
Location:
Posts: 17 |
Maybe elite teams need to play more on normal ice. The enhanced rocks and fantasy ice at slams doesn't prepare them well for the more challenging conditions on club ice.
Even the best club ice requires different skills from slam ice.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 03:10PM |
|
Smallsey42
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 31 |
Just a note - Hannah didn't win anything.
Hanna won the Ontario women's championship.
If we're going to insult or defend teams can we at least spell their names correctly?
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 03:13PM |
|
bennybeam
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Feb 2015
Location:
Posts: 98 |
quote: Originally posted by Russ
Maybe elite teams need to play more on normal ice. The enhanced rocks and fantasy ice at slams doesn't prepare them well for the more challenging conditions on club ice.
Even the best club ice requires different skills from slam ice.
Excellent point! No lively rocks and pristine ice at the club level.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 04:56PM |
|
Gerry
CZ Founder
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002 |
quote: Originally posted by Russ
Maybe elite teams need to play more on normal ice. The enhanced rocks and fantasy ice at slams doesn't prepare them well for the more challenging conditions on club ice.
Even the best club ice requires different skills from slam ice.
I don't think anyone is blaming the ice for Homan's loss. They practice on curling club ice all the time, I don't think that an issue. Teams also play several tour events on during the season on club ice.
As for the "enhanced" rocks, they're no different than the rocks your club would get. The difference being they're typically close to new and still have the lively reactions.
The rocks used in Brampton are the same rocks that are used in the arena at the Men's Tankard as well.
__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!
Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 05:32PM |
|
ronbro
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 23 |
Provincial Playdowns
Scott, Sweeting, Homan, Flury and Arsenault all lost out so far.
Whole new crop of teams to Canadian Scoties.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 05:45PM |
|
jamcan
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: vernon bc
Posts: 2340 |
quote: Originally posted by Gerry
As for the "enhanced" rocks, they're no different than the rocks your club would get. The difference being they're typically close to new and still have the lively reactions.
Whoa there hoss. The rocks we see at slams,national events and some provincials are NOT like club stones.
As much as some want to deny it, these stones have greatly reduced striking bands. This makes them more spherical and thus more lively. Age and granite type have almost nothing to do with it. It's mostly the narrow striking band causing a far different energy transfer due to a smaller impact area.
It's the reason why you can hit 7/8's of a stone and still roll out. And,as usual, this was done for TV to make more spectacular looking shots.
And before you try to refute this, be advised I have this information from icemakers and competitors so I trust the accuracy of their statements 100%.
Just another falsehood to make you think the slam competitors are better than everyone else.
__________________
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
Hunter S. Thompson
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 06:17PM |
|
peteski
Drawmaster
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 631 |
quote: Originally posted by jamcan
Just another falsehood to make you think the slam competitors are better than everyone else.
As Gerry said, the slam competitors also play events at clubs with club rocks and win those events too. I suppose they're probably just lucky.
__________________
Not Pete Steski
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 07:29PM |
|
alex
Swing Artist
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Quesnel
Posts: 420 |
Isn't it odd that three teams (McDonald, Sweeting and Homan) hadn't lost a meaningful game before the final. If it was double or triple knockout they would have had another chance. I realize that plays havoc with people organizing the events and with TV coverage.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 07:45PM |
|
guido
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1418 |
quote: Originally posted by alex
Isn't it odd that three teams (McDonald, Sweeting and Homan) hadn't lost a meaningful game before the final. If it was double or triple knockout they would have had another chance. I realize that plays havoc with people organizing the events and with TV coverage.
Alberta (Sweeting) was a triple knockout.
Doesn't matter what format you use when there is a playoff. If you lose the last game, you don't win the event.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 07:59PM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
Triple knockout
AB was a modified triple knockout, Sweeting only lost once. A true triple knockout you have to lose 3 times. Much better. Winner of A drops to B semi, winner of B drops to C semi. Theoretically you could win all 3 finals and no need for playoffs. Much much better way of having the best team advance.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 08:06PM |
|
Gerry
CZ Founder
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002 |
quote: Originally posted by jamcan
Whoa there hoss. The rocks we see at slams,national events and some provincials are NOT like club stones.
As much as some want to deny it, these stones have greatly reduced striking bands. This makes them more spherical and thus more lively. Age and granite type have almost nothing to do with it. It's mostly the narrow striking band causing a far different energy transfer due to a smaller impact area.
It's the reason why you can hit 7/8's of a stone and still roll out. And,as usual, this was done for TV to make more spectacular looking shots.
And before you try to refute this, be advised I have this information from icemakers and competitors so I trust the accuracy of their statements 100%.
Just another falsehood to make you think the slam competitors are better than everyone else.
The arena ice is more lively, sure because of the hardness of the surface and the warmer air temperature in the building but there's no difference in the rocks. I'd suggest giving Kim a call at Canada Curling Stone, one of the two company's who makes the rocks.
__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!
Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 09:43PM |
|
guido
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1418 |
Re: Triple knockout
quote: Originally posted by IN-OFF-FOR-2
AB was a modified triple knockout, Sweeting only lost once. A true triple knockout you have to lose 3 times. Much better. Winner of A drops to B semi, winner of B drops to C semi. Theoretically you could win all 3 finals and no need for playoffs. Much much better way of having the best team advance.
I agree, but it's not conducive to tv scheduling. Plus all teams know the format before entering. The only provs that were a true triple was PEI. Less teams, lots of time for sched changing.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
01-25-16 10:19PM |
|
jamcan
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: vernon bc
Posts: 2340 |
quote: Originally posted by Gerry
The arena ice is more lively, sure because of the hardness of the surface and the warmer air temperature in the building but there's no difference in the rocks. I'd suggest giving Kim a call at Canada Curling Stone, one of the two company's who makes the rocks.
How is arena ice harder than club ice? And since warmth in an arena heats a stone and causes it to dig in by melting the ice (remember when they were actually covering stones so TV lights wouldn't heat them up?), just exactly how does that make a rock livelier?
I dont need to phone a supplier when its already visually apparent that striking bands at slam events and nationals are narrower than the stones at clubs.
However, here's a better idea. How about you grab a micrometer and measure the width of the striking band on those rocks used for Slam events and compare them to the ones at your home club and other local venues?
Now perhaps the new stones available from suppliers come with narrower striking bands. But the majority of stones at clubs have been around for years, and replacing them isn't cheap.
__________________
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
Hunter S. Thompson
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is . |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|