Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
02-28-16 02:40PM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
Norway
Not sure if I'm reading the scores right but Ulsrud lost the final to Walstad. Curious if Walstad goes to worlds or if Norway has it like other countries where they just nominate a team regardless of the winner. Anyone know?
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 02:43PM |
|
SPMFromPCC
Swing Artist
Registered: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 440 |
According to the Curling News' Facebook post, Ulsrud still goes to worlds.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 02:50PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by SPMFromPCC
According to the Curling News' Facebook post, Ulsrud still goes to worlds.
but ofcourse
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 02:55PM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
Too bad really because as much as I like the Ulsrud team, I think it's good for everyone to have some new teams get a chance. Especially when they've won their championship.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 03:25PM |
|
Gerry
CZ Founder
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002 |
From the sound of things, the way it works in Norway is that teams need to have some success on Tour to be eligible for Worlds Qualification.
The team needed a minimum of 1 QF and 1 SF appearance to be eligible for a chance at Worlds, which would have setup a best of three tournament between Minera Skifer and Ulsrud for the right to go to the World Championship.
__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!
Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 03:36PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
im not a fan of that kid of thing. this is more than likely the team that will be the face of norway once ulsrud steps down. why not let them get some experience at a major championship here. they have to start somewhere
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:10PM |
|
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668 |
quote: Originally posted by misty1
im not a fan of that kid of thing. this is more than likely the team that will be the face of norway once ulsrud steps down. why not let them get some experience at a major championship here. they have to start somewhere
I agree with you Misty. Germany does the same thing as does the USA. Not all of these teams have the time or $$$ to tour so how could they qualify???
__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:38PM |
|
SPMFromPCC
Swing Artist
Registered: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 440 |
Ah, but since sacrosanct Olympic qualifying points (I.E., money) are on the line, nobody can afford to send a less experienced team. Come on, didn't you know??
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:41PM |
|
decade
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 1962 |
quote: Originally posted by Gerry
From the sound of things, the way it works in Norway is that teams need to have some success on Tour to be eligible for Worlds Qualification.
The team needed a minimum of 1 QF and 1 SF appearance to be eligible for a chance at Worlds, which would have setup a best of three tournament between Minera Skifer and Ulsrud for the right to go to the World Championship.
*
i think that it is a great idea. When a championship comes down to a single knockout game, the sending someone with experience makes sense.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:51PM |
|
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668 |
quote: Originally posted by SPMFromPCC
Ah, but since sacrosanct Olympic qualifying points (I.E., money) are on the line, nobody can afford to send a less experienced team. Come on, didn't you know??
OH yes, I forgot
__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:53PM |
|
Western Newbie
Hitting Paint
Registered: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 116 |
Imagine if every province did that this year for the Scotties....
Rachel got to go because of her incredible year.....
MacDonald....
Sweeting...
etc
Rather than the winning teams....
But the pool of talent in Norway is much smaller, and Ulsrud has represented them well over the years...
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 05:57PM |
|
HotRocks
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2015
Location:
Posts: 960 |
perspective
Ulsrud lost 1 game in this NOR championship
It was to Walstad - 6-5...
He also won World silver in 2015 ... World Gold in 2014...
Seems like Norwegians should be the ones who make the decisions about their rep...
they dont try and tell Canada what to do...
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-28-16 07:54PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by HotRocks
Ulsrud lost 1 game in this NOR championship
It was to Walstad - 6-5...
He also won World silver in 2015 ... World Gold in 2014...
Seems like Norwegians should be the ones who make the decisions about their rep...
they dont try and tell Canada what to do...
true but you mention that ulsrud lost only one game in the nationals.guess how many walstad lost? - none
walstad hasnt been to any pro events yet but thats because they wont let them go
not questioning ulsrud's pedigree. he's ione of the best teams tyo ever come out of europe but at some point they might want to give other teams showing promise a chance. sweden did that with sending eriksson to worlds over edin in 2013 and look how great that worked out.
Last edited by misty1 on 02-28-16 at 07:56PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 02:07AM |
|
Gerry
CZ Founder
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002 |
Re: Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by misty1
true but you mention that ulsrud lost only one game in the nationals.guess how many walstad lost? - none
walstad hasnt been to any pro events yet but thats because they wont let them go
not questioning ulsrud's pedigree. he's ione of the best teams tyo ever come out of europe but at some point they might want to give other teams showing promise a chance. sweden did that with sending eriksson to worlds over edin in 2013 and look how great that worked out.
Won't let them go to other events? The team played 8 events on Tour including 2 in Canada and 1 in Japan.
http://curlingzone.com/teams.php?te...&profileid=5975
__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!
Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 08:15AM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Re: Re: Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by Gerry
Won't let them go to other events? The team played 8 events on Tour including 2 in Canada and 1 in Japan.
http://curlingzone.com/teams.php?te...&profileid=5975
im not talking about cashpiels im talking about major international events.i would think that would be obvious. especially since i referenced sweden sending eriksson to worlds in 2013
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 08:54AM |
|
MCC_PE
Hitting Paint
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 140 |
Re: Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by misty1
walstad hasnt been to any pro events yet but thats because they wont let them go
Seems reasonable for Gerry to have interpreted "pro events" as including cashspiels.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 09:33AM |
|
biterbar
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695 |
Re: Re: Re: Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by misty1
im not talking about cashpiels im talking about major international events.i would think that would be obvious. especially since i referenced sweden sending eriksson to worlds in 2013
Baden Masters-Switzerland
Swiss Cup Basel-Switzerland
Direct Horizontal Drilling Classic
Canada Inns Classic
Curling Masters Champery-Switzerland
Karuizawa International-Japan
Mercure Perth Masters-Scotland
German Masters-Germany
41 Games, 5 countries a 19-22 record.
Am I missing something?
__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 01:58PM |
|
Alice
Swing Artist
Registered: Feb 2012
Location:
Posts: 324 |
We have the US sending its men's runnerup, the Germans sending a women's 3rd or 4th (?) place team, and now Norway also sending its men's runnerup. We'll never know which country would've won had all sent their on-ice when-it-counts national champion instead of some teams essentially picked by a committee.
As a little kid I remember the Olympics as a bit of a farce pitting real or secretly supported amateurs v. overt professionals supported by national federations. Now we have for curling a small group of full-time professionals, an ever dwindling handful of real amateurs thanks to the sanctioned cash circuit demands, and more semi-professionals supported by their national federations which edit eligibility rules to try to ensure their National Team gets to worlds in the chase for Olympic lucre.
It's the "good" old days of the Soviet and DDR sports machines when "stakes were high" we got chicanery like crazy doping, dubious equipment, paid coaches picking world reps whom they deem "coachable" and "attractive" to TV advertisers, national team players willing to compete where and whenever the national coaches want (forget family or work life), shifting rules favoring the favorites, and other things the level playing fields of sports are supposed to eliminate.
The purpose of Big TV-Curling appears now just to sell the "legal" brooms, other sponsors' products, ensure only some countries get Olympic berths every four years, all overseen by a few dozen national paid coaches and compensated NGB and WCF leaders with an ever increasing number of paid professional players because - oh heck - the Spirit of Curling is dead as a doornail in this new professional curling world.
I'll go watch the movie about Eddie the Eagle and muse about what movie might be made about the next Winter Olympics.
Last edited by Alice on 02-29-16 at 02:46PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 04:12PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: perspective
quote: Originally posted by biterbar
Baden Masters-Switzerland
Swiss Cup Basel-Switzerland
Direct Horizontal Drilling Classic
Canada Inns Classic
Curling Masters Champery-Switzerland
Karuizawa International-Japan
Mercure Perth Masters-Scotland
German Masters-Germany
41 Games, 5 countries a 19-22 record.
Am I missing something?
major international events would be worlds and europeans , mixed..things like that.
just feel like a team that goes undefeated in their national championship should be rewarded with the honor of repping their country at worlds
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 04:33PM |
|
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668 |
quote: Originally posted by Alice
We have the US sending its men's runnerup, the Germans sending a women's 3rd or 4th (?) place team, and now Norway also sending its men's runnerup. We'll never know which country would've won had all sent their on-ice when-it-counts national champion instead of some teams essentially picked by a committee.
As a little kid I remember the Olympics as a bit of a farce pitting real or secretly supported amateurs v. overt professionals supported by national federations. Now we have for curling a small group of full-time professionals, an ever dwindling handful of real amateurs thanks to the sanctioned cash circuit demands, and more semi-professionals supported by their national federations which edit eligibility rules to try to ensure their National Team gets to worlds in the chase for Olympic lucre.
It's the "good" old days of the Soviet and DDR sports machines when "stakes were high" we got chicanery like crazy doping, dubious equipment, paid coaches picking world reps whom they deem "coachable" and "attractive" to TV advertisers, national team players willing to compete where and whenever the national coaches want (forget family or work life), shifting rules favoring the favorites, and other things the level playing fields of sports are supposed to eliminate.
The purpose of Big TV-Curling appears now just to sell the "legal" brooms, other sponsors' products, ensure only some countries get Olympic berths every four years, all overseen by a few dozen national paid coaches and compensated NGB and WCF leaders with an ever increasing number of paid professional players because - oh heck - the Spirit of Curling is dead as a doornail in this new professional curling world.
I'll go watch the movie about Eddie the Eagle and muse about what movie might be made about the next Winter Olympics.
Excellent point. Why bother with a championship if you already know who you are sending. In the case of Germany, Andrea can win every event she enters, they still won't send her team to Worlds.
World curling Federation can make a rule - whoever wins your National Championship can go to Worlds.
But that won't happen...
__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 04:53PM |
|
biterbar
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695 |
quote: Originally posted by curlerbroad
Excellent point. Why bother with a championship if you already know who you are sending. In the case of Germany, Andrea can win every event she enters, they still won't send her team to Worlds.
World curling Federation can make a rule - whoever wins your National Championship can go to Worlds.
But that won't happen...
Why bother? So you can be the National champion, get funding from your Ministry of Sports, prove you are the best team in the country.
Like the USA all the participants know the rules. They needed at QF and a SF to qualify with the win, but they got 3 QF's and lost 2 of those by one rock. They are all around 25 years old an have a bright future, I'd say.
Last time Brady Clark go hot and won Nationals a ninth place finish meant we had to go to Germany to the qualifier to reclaim our Olympic spot.
With the money in the Olympics and China and other countries sending professionals everyone needs to make sure they have the team with the best chance at Worlds. I would say the USA and Norway accomplished this.
__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 05:03PM |
|
dbsdbs
Drawmaster
Registered: Feb 2013
Location:
Posts: 812 |
quote: Originally posted by Alice
As a little kid I remember the Olympics as a bit of a farce pitting real or secretly supported amateurs v. overt professionals supported by national federations. Now we have for curling a small group of full-time professionals, an ever dwindling handful of real amateurs thanks to the sanctioned cash circuit demands, and more semi-professionals supported by their national federations which edit eligibility rules to try to ensure their National Team gets to worlds in the chase for Olympic lucre.
For me, the Olympics were much more interesting in the "good old days" when USA sent amateur athletes to compete, never mind who they had to beat. I have no interest in watching NBA pros compete against teams that have little or no chance of beating them. I'd be happy to watch USA champions, i.e. those teams who won their titles on the ice, compete in World and Olympic events too. But money gets in the way of all of that. After call, what could be more important than winning those sacred gold medals?
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 05:07PM |
|
misty1
Supreme Champion!
Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 6002 |
quote: Originally posted by biterbar
Why bother? So you can be the National champion, get funding from your Ministry of Sports, prove you are the best team in the country.
Like the USA all the participants know the rules. They needed at QF and a SF to qualify with the win, but they got 3 QF's and lost 2 of those by one rock. They are all around 25 years old an have a bright future, I'd say.
Last time Brady Clark go hot and won Nationals a ninth place finish meant we had to go to Germany to the qualifier to reclaim our Olympic spot.
With the money in the Olympics and China and other countries sending professionals everyone needs to make sure they have the team with the best chance at Worlds. I would say the USA and Norway accomplished this.
you have to be fair to brady. he finished 5-6 and got unlucky that that year, would finish 9th.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
02-29-16 05:29PM |
|
biterbar
Drawmaster
Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695 |
quote: Originally posted by misty1
you have to be fair to brady. he finished 5-6 and got unlucky that that year, would finish 9th.
True. I believe they started out a bit slow that year. They were also the best team in Jacksonville, no doubt about that.
__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is . |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|