|
Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
| 06-06-17 11:50AM |
|
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker
Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875 |
Still no answer for 2016-17
"The two additional teams were added based on their performance on the 2016-17 Canadian Team Ranking System"
As quoted by Curling Canada for the 2 additional spots.
The CTRS teams are supposed to be added "Highest ranked team on the 2016–17 CTRS NOT ALREADY QUALIFIED for the Trials or Pre-Trials"
AGAIN, 2016-17 ..... not requalifying, prequalifying, dequalifying, from previous years totals.
You've bumped teams "Already qualified" to different qualification spots
How then is it possible they recalculate the TWO YEAR TOTAL 2015-2017 to include the additional teams?
Is it indeed 2016-17 as stated or do whatever you want to the CTRS points over the years to make it 2015-17?
Someone please from CCA or CC explain.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
| 07-13-17 04:48PM |
|
ott-am
Swing Artist
Registered: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 371 |
Re: Still no answer for 2016-17
Someone please from CCA or CC explain. [/B][/QUOTE]
This is not a CCA site. If you have any questions for the CCA, perhaps you should write or call the CCA?
__________________
Art M
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
| 07-13-17 05:11PM |
|
ott-am
Swing Artist
Registered: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 371 |
Re: Still no answer for 2016-17
Someone please from CCA or CC explain. [/B][/QUOTE]
This is not a CCA site. If you have any questions for the CCA, perhaps you should write or call the CCA.
__________________
Art M
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
| 07-14-17 02:54AM |
|
Stumpy
Harvey Hacksmasher
Registered: Feb 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 46 |
Re: Still no answer for 2016-17
quote:
Originally posted by IN-OFF-FOR-2
"The two additional teams were added based on their performance on the 2016-17 Canadian Team Ranking System"
As quoted by Curling Canada for the 2 additional spots.
The CTRS teams are supposed to be added "Highest ranked team on the 2016–17 CTRS NOT ALREADY QUALIFIED for the Trials or Pre-Trials"
AGAIN, 2016-17 ..... not requalifying, prequalifying, dequalifying, from previous years totals.
You've bumped teams "Already qualified" to different qualification spots
How then is it possible they recalculate the TWO YEAR TOTAL 2015-2017 to include the additional teams?
Is it indeed 2016-17 as stated or do whatever you want to the CTRS points over the years to make it 2015-17?
Someone please from CCA or CC explain.
I think it's time to accept that no one cares as much as you. You're missing the entire point. The entire point of the trials is to select the best team to represent Canada. They don't have to be fair, they can set their own rules, and they can do whatever they want, all in the name of getting to what they feel is the best team. If they want to add 2 more teams that's well within their right. If tomorrow they announced that the trials were cancelled and they named the representatives with no playdowns, a la Great Britain, that would be well within their right too.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
| 07-15-17 05:42PM |
|
alex
Swing Artist
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Quesnel
Posts: 420 |
Re: Re: Still no answer for 2016-17
quote:
Originally posted by Stumpy
I think it's time to accept that no one cares as much as you. You're missing the entire point. The entire point of the trials is to select the best team to represent Canada. They don't have to be fair, they can set their own rules, and they can do whatever they want, all in the name of getting to what they feel is the best team. If they want to add 2 more teams that's well within their right. If tomorrow they announced that the trials were cancelled and they named the representatives with no playdowns, a la Great Britain, that would be well within their right too.
I would think they should be fair and transparent.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
|
 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is . |
  |
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
CurlingZone > Chat Forums > Tours, Events and Major Championships > Playdowns > Men's ROTR Qualifying for Ottawa
In the run up to Christmas Day, 1893, the Aberdeen Peoples's Journal offered a prize of one guinea for the best letter about curling! That's the invitation... (read more)
A quick break for the Memorial Day holiday and we're back with our guest and new USA Curling Women’s National Team & Juniors Director Jessica Schultz.... (read more)
I am in week 3 of isolation/quarantine/home schooling and getting a little squirrel-y. Personal hygiene has become optional. The kids have watched the entire... (read more)
On today's World Curling Report...we recap Day 1 of the 2019 Canada Cup. (read more)