Forums Menu

User: 
Pass:  

Curling Scores

W: USA Curling Junior National Championships
Eau Claire, WI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: W6 -- Thu, Mar 28 -- 4:00pm CT
Berg 10th
Scheel  Watch Live Curling!
Berg 10th
Schapman  Watch Live Curling!
Giroux 10  Final
Pekowitz (9) Watch Live Curling!
Viau 10th
Johnson  Watch Live Curling!
: Canadian Wheelchair Championship
Moose Jaw, SK
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 8 -- Thu, Mar 28 -- 1:30pm MT
SK (Pederson) Final
ON (Rees) (8)
SK (Dash) Final
NL (Carroll) (7)
NB (Fitzgerald) Final
ON (Morris) (7)
AB (Kuchelyma) Final
BC (Austgarden) (EE)
MB (Thiessen) Final
AB (Purvis) (8)
M: USA Curling Junior National Championships
Eau Claire, WI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: M6 -- Thu, Mar 28 -- 12:00pm CT
Church Final
Rose (9) Watch Live Curling!
Brenden Final
Guentzel (9) Watch Live Curling!
Fitzgerald Final
Hebert (9) Watch Live Curling!
Lannoye Final
Cenzalli (10) Watch Live Curling!
M: Canadian Mixed Doubles Curling Championship
Fredericton, NB
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Fri, Mar 22 -- 1:00pm AT
Lott/Lott Final
Walk/Muyr (8) Watch Live Curling!
M: Swiss Junior Championships
Thun, SUI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF2 -- Sun, Mar 24 -- 3:00am ET
Caccivio Final
Brauchli 12  (EE)
Dryburgh Final
Ringgenberg (9)
W: Swiss Junior Championships
Thun, SUI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF2 -- Sun, Mar 24 -- 9:00am CET
Schwaller Final
Oberson (9)
Blackham Final
von Arx (9)
W: NWTCA Curling Club Championships
Fort Smith, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 3 -- Sat, Mar 23 -- 11:00am MT
Stroeder Final
Delorey (7)
M: NWTCA Curling Club Championships
Fort Smith, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 3 -- Sat, Mar 23 -- 1:00pm ET
Delorey Final
Lockhart (EE)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

CurlingZone : Powered by vBulletin>
<smallfont><b><a href=CurlingZone > Chat Forums > General Curling Chat > Rock Talk > Shorty Jenkins Classic?

Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
Page 1 of 2 -- Go to: | 1 | 2 | »»   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread   Post A Reply
09-10-19 08:17PM
MeaghanEdwards is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MeaghanEdwards Find more posts by MeaghanEdwards Add MeaghanEdwards to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MeaghanEdwards
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Aug 2018
Location:
Posts: 699

Shorty Jenkins Classic?

Will there be any live stream or will the footage be solely shown on Cogeco? Unfortunately I have Bell, seems shortsighted to have such a great field only being shown on YourTV, if this is the case.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-11-19 08:31PM
curlerbroad is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlerbroad Click here to Send curlerbroad a Private Message Find more posts by curlerbroad Add curlerbroad to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668

Who is playing for Joanne Courtney?

__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-11-19 08:34PM
MeaghanEdwards is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MeaghanEdwards Find more posts by MeaghanEdwards Add MeaghanEdwards to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MeaghanEdwards
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Aug 2018
Location:
Posts: 699

Lindsay Dubue is filling in for Jo

Last edited by MeaghanEdwards on 09-11-19 at 10:45PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-12-19 04:28PM
hogged again is offline Click Here to See the Profile for hogged again Find more posts by hogged again Add hogged again to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
hogged again
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Mar 2019
Location:
Posts: 659

What's all this curling talk? I came here for phony passport!!!!!
Need 4 for Antarctica so my team can qualify for Olympics.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-13-19 12:52PM
curlerbroad is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlerbroad Click here to Send curlerbroad a Private Message Find more posts by curlerbroad Add curlerbroad to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668

Wow Scott McDonald looks to be struggling...another loss this morning. Let's hope is just early season rust.

__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-13-19 05:09PM
MeaghanEdwards is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MeaghanEdwards Find more posts by MeaghanEdwards Add MeaghanEdwards to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MeaghanEdwards
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Aug 2018
Location:
Posts: 699

Yea a number of Canadian (and American) teams are struggling but so early in the season, I'll put it down to early season rust.

Is it just me/the angle/me looking too much into it or does Koe look owchy in the leg/hip/knee here?

https://twitter.com/CurlingZone/sta...339557229985793

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-14-19 04:40PM
decade is offline Click Here to See the Profile for decade Click here to Send decade a Private Message Find more posts by decade Add decade to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
decade
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 1962

quote:
Originally posted by MeaghanEdwards
Yea a number of Canadian (and American) teams are struggling but so early in the season, I'll put it down to early season rust.

]



But as usual after 4 games in both the mens/womens draw the cream has started to rise. Only 1 real dark horse in the top 8 men and 2 in the top 8 women.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-14-19 10:51PM
On The Nose is offline Click Here to See the Profile for On The Nose Find more posts by On The Nose Add On The Nose to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
On The Nose
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Apr 2014
Location: In the House
Posts: 608

The Gushue/Koe game on Saturday night was interesting in the manner in which it ended...
Extra end, Koe with Hammer. The only rock in the House is an unguarded Gushue rock in the back/side 8 foot. Gushue Hogs his first rock. Koe takes Gushue’s back/side 8 foot rock out, and shooter rolls out.
House is empty. Gushue wants to put his last rock on the T-Line, 8 foot. He comes up a foot and a half short of the House.
Koe has an open draw - with only the one guard - for the win. Hebert and Flasch start pounding it about 7 feet before the Hog Line. The two of them pounding all the rest of the way... got it to bite about 3 inches of the top 12.

During that extra end, several other games had finished, and the sheets were empty except for one sheet 3 sheets away from Koe/Gushue. Ice slowed. Skips didn’t adapt. Almost blanked the extra end!

__________________
"It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own... but the great man is he who, in the midst of the crowd, keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude." ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-15-19 12:17AM
MeaghanEdwards is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MeaghanEdwards Find more posts by MeaghanEdwards Add MeaghanEdwards to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MeaghanEdwards
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Aug 2018
Location:
Posts: 699

That would have been an interesting match to watch indeed! Johnathan Brazeau mentioned Kev fired a bullet and sent a rock flying two sheets across!

https://twitter.com/JonathanBrazeau...042364014899200

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-18-19 09:41AM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

Fleury & Co. would be the last team in the world to complain but there's no way they failed to notice that once having qualified for the Playoffs they would have to defeat both Tirinzoni ( ranked # 1) and then Homan ( ranked # 3)* just to reach the final game.

On the other hand, at the bottom half of the draw, Jones had to defeat Yoshimura ( ranked # 12) and Gim ( ranked # 30) in order to qualify.

Does this look "fair and balanced" to you? I believe the Drawmaster could not have made it more flawed if s(he ) wanted to!

Any Drawmaster should have been aware that the prime objective is make it possible for the two top seeds Not to meet before the final game.** But this person chose to do exactly the opposite by ensuring the two top seeds could not possibly meet in the final game.

* Homan , #3, should have been positioned on the Bottom rung of the Bottom half of this draw.

** Can you imagine in tennis, for example, the consequences of scheduling Nadal & Fed. or Serena & Bianca to meet in say the Fourth Round ?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-18-19 12:18PM
guido is offline Click Here to See the Profile for guido Find more posts by guido Add guido to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
guido
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1418

The pools are set up according to ranking. The playoffs are set up according to how you do in the pools. Pretty easily understood.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-19-19 09:03AM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

"The playoffs are set up according to how you do in the pools."

They are?

Four of the teams in the Shorty Jenkins' Playoff won their Pool with 4-0 records while each of the other teams won their Pool with identical 3-1 records.

So how come, guido, all the teams with identical W-L records were simply not placed in the same half of the draw?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-19-19 11:02AM
albetts is offline Click Here to See the Profile for albetts Click here to Send albetts a Private Message Find more posts by albetts Add albetts to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
albetts
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 1120

Good question.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-19-19 04:12PM
IN-OFF-FOR-2 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for IN-OFF-FOR-2 Find more posts by IN-OFF-FOR-2 Add IN-OFF-FOR-2 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875

playoff seeding

At first glance each side of the playoff pools had 2 teams 4-0 and 2 teams 3-1, seems pretty even.
The only way to make it absolutely fair would be to seed all 4 teams 4-0 one to four based on dtb scores and the 4 teams at 3-1 5-8th
Then set the pools with the top half 1vs 8 and 4 vs 5
Bottom half 2 vs 7 3vs 6
Play on

Last edited by IN-OFF-FOR-2 on 09-19-19 at 04:15PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-20-19 05:40PM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

Bang-On, IN-OFF !

Too bad you were not in Cornwall last week to help those folks when they needed it most.

I agree with your suggestion how the playoff draw should have been designed to help ensure fairness and balance.

We differ only in that I had (3 vs 6 ) in the top half and ( 4 vs 5 ) in the bottom half, but I don't consider that significant.

What's really key, of course, is that #1 and #2 should be kept as far apart as possible for as long as possible,( and the same with #3 and #4), because this helps to ensure most of the top teams will survive deep into the bonspiel. "In the end, without proper seeding, many of the superteams will be left on the sidelines and most of the SF's and Finals will become lopsided affairs."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-21-19 05:17PM
Gerry is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Gerry Click here to Send Gerry a Private Message Visit Gerry's homepage! Find more posts by Gerry Add Gerry to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Gerry
CZ Founder

 

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002

The Shorty playoffs were seeded like every other event is.

1v8
4v5
2v7
3v6

That sets up semifinals where 1v4 and 2v3 face each other if favourites win.

__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!

Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-23-19 11:58AM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

"That sets up semifinals where 1v4 and 2v3 face each other if favorites win."

Thank you Captain Obvious, lol

If the Shorty Jenkins had used the W-L records of the eight teams and had factored in the OOM's ( week 7 ), and then applied the formula you stated was used, the playoff draw would have been as follows:

1) Tirinzoni vs 8) Galusha
4) M'H vs 5) Fleury

2) Homan vs 7) Gim
3) Jones vs 6) Yoshimura

However, that's not what happened. The OOM's were not factored into their decision as to where each of the teams would be positioned. As a result it was somehow determined that the draw should be as follows:

Tirinzoni ( 4-0) vs Fleury (3-1)
Homan ( 4-0) vs Galusha (3-1)
Jones (4-0) vs Yoshimura 3-1)
M'H (4-0) vs Gim (3-1)

The essential question here is how was it decided which team should occupy each of the eight positions, and what criteria was used to create such a lopsided, unmatched draw. If it was not possible to accurately assess which team belonged in which playoff position, what in the hell is the rationale for having a predetermined formula to position them?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-23-19 09:42PM
IN-OFF-FOR-2 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for IN-OFF-FOR-2 Find more posts by IN-OFF-FOR-2 Add IN-OFF-FOR-2 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875

seedings

I don't think the weekly spiels should base their playoff seedings based on the previous week's OOM. I think it makes more sense to base it on THAT week's performance only, based on the teams' performance against their peers that week only. What a team did almost 2 years ago with the rolling OOM points should have no bearing on the playoffs in any one particular week going forward. IMO. An example would be say Team Koe goes 3-2 but Team Howard goes 5-0. Based on OOM why should Koe be ranked higher in the playoffs for that event than Howard? I just think each week and each event should be based on that week's stats only.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-24-19 11:50AM
Gerry is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Gerry Click here to Send Gerry a Private Message Visit Gerry's homepage! Find more posts by Gerry Add Gerry to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Gerry
CZ Founder

 

Registered: Sep 2002
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 4002

quote:
Originally posted by Deliverer
The essential question here is how was it decided which team should occupy each of the eight positions, and what criteria was used to create such a lopsided, unmatched draw. If it was not possible to accurately assess which team belonged in which playoff position, what in the hell is the rationale for having a predetermined formula to position them?


Win-Loss Record, then shootout score seeds the teams.

__________________
CurlingZone
Everything...Curling!

Please click on our sponsors' banners periodically, as visiting their sites helps keep CurlingZone.com Free!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-24-19 08:47PM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

"Say Team Koe goes 3-2 but Team Howard goes 5-0. Based on OOM why should Koe be ranked higher in the playoff for that event than Howard"?

Guess I didn't explain that very well. I believe the W-L record must always take priority and OOM's should never be taken into consideration unless the W-L records are identical.

So, in your example, Koe would not be ranked higher than Howard in the playoff. In fact he would automatically be ranked lower than any team which won more than three games. And if by chance there were eight teams with records of 4-1 or better, Koe and Co. would be on the first stagecoach to Alberta!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-24-19 09:02PM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

"Win-Loss Record, then shootout score seeds the teams" still raises the questions as to what criteria was used to decide which teams would play in Shootout # 1, #2, #3 and #4 and how the results of those shootouts were used to determine exactly where each of the eight teams would be positioned.

Using the Shorty Jenkins as an example, an explanation would be appreciated.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-25-19 01:28PM
biterbar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for biterbar Click here to Send biterbar a Private Message Find more posts by biterbar Add biterbar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
biterbar
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695

quote:
Originally posted by Deliverer
"Win-Loss Record, then shootout score seeds the teams" still raises the questions as to what criteria was used to decide which teams would play in Shootout # 1, #2, #3 and #4 and how the results of those shootouts were used to determine exactly where each of the eight teams would be positioned.

Using the Shorty Jenkins as an example, an explanation would be appreciated.



I am assuming "shootout" is a DSC ranking. If so, What is the confusion? What happened last week or last year has no bearing on the situation. After initial pool seeding all pertinent seeding and records are what happened that event.

__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-26-19 05:09PM
Deliverer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Deliverer Click here to Send Deliverer a Private Message Find more posts by Deliverer Add Deliverer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Deliverer
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

My question, or "confusion" as you put it, boils down to what were the shootout or DSG/LSD results in the Shorty Jenkins, and how were those results used to position or seed each of the teams in the playoffs.

Hopefully that's clear enough to enable you to fill in the blanks in five minutes or less. If not, no worries, Sport.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-26-19 09:31PM
IN-OFF-FOR-2 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for IN-OFF-FOR-2 Find more posts by IN-OFF-FOR-2 Add IN-OFF-FOR-2 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 1875

I'm curious. Is there, or should there be a set standard for all WCT events so that all teams at all events are playing with the same set of rules regarding seeding, both the pools or triple knockout seeding, and the playoffs? Edited here, Also the pregame draw the button routine, including coin flip, choice of colour or last practice, AND how to do the draw the button for hammer and later include these measurements for tie breakers. Whether it be Latvia or Kalamazoo. Same standards for all. It's purely evident with some of the spiels I've attended there is not.
Perhaps post the official guideline to hosting here and on the WCT site and ensure it's followed to the letter. Fair for all is fair.

Last edited by IN-OFF-FOR-2 on 09-26-19 at 09:58PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

09-27-19 10:14AM
biterbar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for biterbar Click here to Send biterbar a Private Message Find more posts by biterbar Add biterbar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
biterbar
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695

quote:
Originally posted by Deliverer
My question, or "confusion" as you put it, boils down to what were the shootout or DSG/LSD results in the Shorty Jenkins, and how were those results used to position or seed each of the teams in the playoffs.

Hopefully that's clear enough to enable you to fill in the blanks in five minutes or less. If not, no worries, Sport.



OK.

The 4-0 team with the lowest DSC total of the four 4-0 teams was the number 1 seed.

The 4-0 team with the 2nd lowest DSC total of the four 4-0 teams was the number two seed.

The 4-0 Team with the 3rd lowest DSC total of the four 4-0 teams was the third seed.

The 4-0 team with the 4th lowest total DSC total of the four 4-0 teams was the 4th seed.

The 3-1 team with the lowest DSC total of the four 3-1 teams was the number 5 seed.

The 3-1 team with the 2nd lowest DSC total of the four 3-1 teams was the number 6 seed.

The 3-1 Team with the 3rd lowest DSC total of the four 3-1 teams was the seventh seed.

The 3-1 team with the 4th lowest total DSC total of the four 3-1 teams was the 8th seed.

Capisce?

__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

All times are GMT. The time now is . Post New Thread   Post A Reply
Page 1 of 2 -- Go to: | 1 | 2 | »»   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to thisThread

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

Curling Scores

W: USA Curling Junior National Championships
Eau Claire, WI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: W6 -- Thu, Mar 28 -- 4:00pm CT
Berg 10th
Scheel  Watch Live Curling!
Berg 10th
Schapman  Watch Live Curling!
Giroux 10  Final
Pekowitz (9) Watch Live Curling!
Viau 10th
Johnson  Watch Live Curling!
M: USA Curling Junior National Championships
Eau Claire, WI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: M6 -- Thu, Mar 28 -- 12:00pm CT
Church Final
Rose (9) Watch Live Curling!
Brenden Final
Guentzel (9) Watch Live Curling!
Fitzgerald Final
Hebert (9) Watch Live Curling!
Lannoye Final
Cenzalli (10) Watch Live Curling!
M: Canadian Mixed Doubles Curling Championship
Fredericton, NB
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Fri, Mar 22 -- 1:00pm AT
Lott/Lott Final
Walk/Muyr (8) Watch Live Curling!
M: Swiss Junior Championships
Thun, SUI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF2 -- Sun, Mar 24 -- 3:00am ET
Caccivio Final
Brauchli 12  (EE)
Dryburgh Final
Ringgenberg (9)
W: Swiss Junior Championships
Thun, SUI
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF2 -- Sun, Mar 24 -- 9:00am CET
Schwaller Final
Oberson (9)
Blackham Final
von Arx (9)
W: NWTCA Curling Club Championships
Fort Smith, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 3 -- Sat, Mar 23 -- 11:00am MT
Stroeder Final
Delorey (7)
M: NWTCA Curling Club Championships
Fort Smith, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 3 -- Sat, Mar 23 -- 1:00pm ET
Delorey Final
Lockhart (EE)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

Recent News

Recent
Homan Brings Home Gold

Homan Brings Home Gold

Sydney, Canada - In front of a full house with over 4,000 spectators, Canada (photo: Stephen Fisher, World Curling) beat Switzerland by 7-5 to take gold at the BKT Tires World Women's Curling Championship 2024.

Curling Photos

Recent

Curling Blogs

Facebook Feed

Twitter Feed

To top ↑