Forums Menu

User: 
Pass:  

Curling Scores

Click Event to Show Scoreboard
M: Tim Hortons Roar of the Rings
W: Tim Hortons Roar of the Rings
M: Olympic Qualification Event
W: Olympic Qualification Event
M: Farmers Edge SCT
W: BC Scotties Open Event #1
: Dawson Creek Cash Spiel - Challenge
W: KW Granite U18 Girls Spiel
M: BC Mens - Island Playdowns
M: KW Granite U18 Boys Spiel
M: MCT Championships
M: Dawson Creek Cash Spiel - Competitive
W: MCT Championships
M: Crestwood U18 Juvenile Mens Bonspiel
: Crestwood U18 Juvenile Womens Bonspiel
W: Curl Mesabi Classic
M: Curl Mesabi Classic
W: USA Junior National Qualifier 3
Central Time (CT)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

CurlingZone : Powered by vBulletin>
<smallfont><b><a href=CurlingZone > Chat Forums > General Curling Chat > Rock Talk > Page plays itself out again

Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
Page 2 of 2 -- Go to: ««   | 1 | 2 |   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread   Post A Reply
02-07-17 11:12AM
Stumpy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Stumpy Click here to Send Stumpy a Private Message Find more posts by Stumpy Add Stumpy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Stumpy
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Feb 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 46

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Page plays itself out again

quote:
Originally posted by CURLING NUTS


I didn't miss your point whatsoever. MY point was, regardless of how team Epping played the round robin winner is not rewarded. "Oh, we won the round robin..let's go out and play another prelimanary". The page is weighted for more games and ticket sales, and allows in many cases, too many teams to slip in the back door with marginal records.



My counter argument to that is the provincial championships are supposed to reward the team with the best chance to win the national championship. Or at least that's what the original goal was. The argument could be made that since the national championship requires one to win multiple win-or-go-home games, the provincial championship should do the same. Obviously the winner of a single game accomplishes the opposite - I don't think there's anyone that would argue that Tuck would have put up a better round robin record at the Brier than Epping. But the OCA isn't looking for the best round robin record, the OCA is looking to increase Canadian championships by OCA teams. Grooming them using the same playoff system by battle testing them in single game elimination seems to be the proven method Canada-wide. Whether that's still relevant or necessary after the growth of the WCT is up-for-debate, but there certainly isn't going to be a change any time soon.

Do you suggest this carries over into other sports? A sports season is just a large round robin. Do you believe it's unfair that the Blue Jays beat Texas in the playoffs? How dare a wild card team beat the team with the best regular season record! Should the Stanley Cup automatically be played between the team with the top record in each conference? Otherwise it's unfair to those teams?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 11:34AM
guido is offline Click Here to See the Profile for guido Click here to Send guido a Private Message Find more posts by guido Add guido to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
guido
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 869

Re: Page plays itself out again

quote:
Originally posted by CURLING NUTS
Not that Glen and the boys are undeserving, but I feel the page playoff system should be re-examined. Other than ticket sales, why should Epping, the clear cut winner of the round robin be forced to play a preliminary game? I know there are many varied opinions on this, but in my view, the page system SUCKS!
In my opinion we should go back to a semi-final/final format. Page playoff was clearly originally made for pool play, not round robins.


If this was the case, Epping would have only had ONE chance. Lose and DONE.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 11:35AM
ngm is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ngm Click here to Send ngm a Private Message Find more posts by ngm Add ngm to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ngm
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2011
Location:
Posts: 272

Here's what I wrote one of the last few dozen times we had this same discussion. The key point is in the last paragraph.

quote:
These are some considerations in designing a curling event:

1. You want the best team to win.
2. You want to have a predictable schedule for the players.
3. You want to have a predictable schedule for the live spectators (if applicable).
4. You want to have a predictable schedule for television viewers (if applicable).
5. You want as many games as possible to be meaningful and interesting.

Here are some formats and their pros and cons:

A. Pure double/triple knockout. Possibly the best at assuring item 1. Satisfies 5. perfectly. Terrible for 2, 3,and 4. Many single game draws needed at end of event.

B. Modified double/triple knockout leading to "qualifiers" and single elimination playoffs. OK for 1., in that the best teams make the playoffs, but then a crapshoot. Good for 5. Not so great (but better than A) for 2, 3, 4. Efficient for cashspiels.

C. Pure round robin with tie break for champion. Very good for 1. rivaling
A. Very good for 2, 3, and 4. But utterly abysmal for 5. The entire final round or even two could be meaningless for all. There is no "championship" game, necessarily. Time consuming.

D. Round robin with playoffs Brier original (2 v. 3 then winner v. 1). OK for 1 the best teams are in the playoffs but then a bit of a crapshoot. Fine for 2,3,4. Better with 5 than pure round robin. At least a few of the final rounds can be meaningful Time consuming.

E. Round robin with playoffs World version 1 (1 v. 4, 2 v. 3, then a final) Same as D. but very risky for 1 seed. An extra team in the playoffs improves item 5.

F. Round robin with playoffs almost double knockout version, a.k.a. "Page" system. Pretty good for 1. Good for 2, 3, 4. Better than C and D for 5 (more playoff teams.) Main criticism is that perhaps round robin winner not rewarded "enough".

All the systems really do have their pros and cons. Some people will be miserable no matter what - because they are miserable people and not because of the particulars of any tournament organization.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 01:25PM
Itsjustagame is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Itsjustagame Find more posts by Itsjustagame Add Itsjustagame to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Itsjustagame
Hitting Paint

 

Registered: Aug 2014
Location:
Posts: 106

ngm :

I like your analysis of pros and cons of each format.

I ABSOLUTELY LOVE your last sentence : Some people will be miserable no matter what - because they are miserable people and not of the particulars of any tournament or organization.

It is my experience that the ones that are always complaining about the set up of the event being unfair have two things in common. 1) they did not win. 2) they have never organized an event themselves.

As for the ones complaining about the tie-breakers schedule, the WCT event I use to run had tie-breakers on Saturday night at 11pm. I will always remember the words of Sherri Middaugh. She was involved in one of these late games. I felt so bad and approached her as an organizer to say that I was sorry about this. Her answer was priceless. ''Don't worry about it. That's the price we have to pay for not winning the games we should have won.''

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 05:43PM
CURLING NUTS is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CURLING NUTS Click here to Send CURLING NUTS a Private Message Visit CURLING NUTS's homepage! Find more posts by CURLING NUTS Add CURLING NUTS to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CURLING NUTS
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 217

Re: Re: Page plays itself out again

quote:
Originally posted by guido

If this was the case, Epping would have only had ONE chance. Lose and DONE.



I'll bet, if you ask Epping he would have preferred a well deserved rest, not a made for tv... preliminary game. He might have played better with a rest, they were maybe showing fatigue. There has to be a reward for the round robin winner, or just run seeded pools.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 05:51PM
CURLING NUTS is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CURLING NUTS Click here to Send CURLING NUTS a Private Message Visit CURLING NUTS's homepage! Find more posts by CURLING NUTS Add CURLING NUTS to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CURLING NUTS
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 217

quote:
Originally posted by ngm
Here's what I wrote one of the last few dozen times we had this same discussion. The key point is in the last paragraph.




"D" is the perfect tried and true solution. Marginal teams rarely get in the back door. That's my $0.02. Over and out.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 06:22PM
jasoon is offline Click Here to See the Profile for jasoon Click here to Send jasoon a Private Message Find more posts by jasoon Add jasoon to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jasoon
Knee-Slider

 

Registered: Feb 2017
Location:
Posts: 2

epping lost

The problem isnt that epping lost. The problem is if he would have won, he would have just won an extra game he shouldn't have had to play. If he goes directly to the final and loses, fine. At least he got that advantage.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 06:29PM
jasoon is offline Click Here to See the Profile for jasoon Click here to Send jasoon a Private Message Find more posts by jasoon Add jasoon to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jasoon
Knee-Slider

 

Registered: Feb 2017
Location:
Posts: 2

Situation D

This is the best solution of the ones listed, but you need not get rid of the 3 vs 4 game. Just keep the situation the same as it is now. Just eliminate the 1 vs 2 game, and give #1 a spot in the finals. Yes it is one and done, and they don't get a second chance either. But in the 1 vs 2 game, ONLY the loser gets a second chance anyway. The winner doesnt. And if #1 is 11-0 and second is 8-3 like in the scoties with rachel Homan a few years ago, if you want to reward the winner of the round robin, it makes no sense to tell a 11-0 team we will give you a second chance if you lose, but if you win you get no better than a one and done final, which you should have being given anyway.

Last edited by jasoon on 02-07-17 at 06:32PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 08:07PM
guido is offline Click Here to See the Profile for guido Click here to Send guido a Private Message Find more posts by guido Add guido to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
guido
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 869

Re: Re: Re: Page plays itself out again

quote:
Originally posted by CURLING NUTS


I'll bet, if you ask Epping he would have preferred a well deserved rest, not a made for tv... preliminary game. He might have played better with a rest, they were maybe showing fatigue. There has to be a reward for the round robin winner, or just run seeded pools.



Really????

Poor John was tired. They might have shown some fatigue? The reward was 2 chances to get to the final.

I wonder if that over 50 back end of Howards were a bit tired??? They should have been, after all they are almost twice John's age.

I'll bet, if you asked Epping, he will be the first to say they screwed up the excellent situation they were in.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-07-17 10:38PM
Prawnpuller is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Prawnpuller Click here to Send Prawnpuller a Private Message Find more posts by Prawnpuller Add Prawnpuller to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Prawnpuller
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Feb 2013
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 46

This thread seems to be more geared to Epping losing out than a suitable system of play downs.....Curling like all sports is a "what have you done lately" scenario."...He played well but not well enough under a system they all understood going in. He lost. Get over it and move on.




Two things can happen.....one is bad

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-09-17 10:49AM
CURLING NUTS is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CURLING NUTS Click here to Send CURLING NUTS a Private Message Visit CURLING NUTS's homepage! Find more posts by CURLING NUTS Add CURLING NUTS to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CURLING NUTS
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 217

quote:
Originally posted by Prawnpuller
This thread seems to be more geared to Epping losing out than a suitable system of play downs.....Curling like all sports is a "what have you done lately" scenario."...He played well but not well enough under a system they all understood going in. He lost. Get over it and move on.



Two things can happen.....one is bad



I couldn't care a less who won the thing! My point was there are better systems that reward and take into consideration the round-robin winner. I still maintain that round robin, (tie breaker if applicable) semi and final playoff is the way to go. Give me a bye(s) to the final anytime, I'll take it.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-09-17 11:44AM
Ajay is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Ajay Click here to Send Ajay a Private Message Find more posts by Ajay Add Ajay to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Ajay
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Mar 2014
Location:
Posts: 376

I feel the page system is the fairest way, short of playing a 2 of 3 or 3 of 5. ( neither will happen) . Epping and the Falcons had their respective championships sewed up by all normal game standards and they both choked in the last few minutes of the game. Neither had anything to do with the playoff process.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-10-17 04:04PM
Longroll is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Longroll Click here to Send Longroll a Private Message Find more posts by Longroll Add Longroll to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Longroll
Knee-Slider

 

Registered: Apr 2016
Location:
Posts: 1

Doesn't the team with the best record in the round robin get hammer in the 1-2 game? And doesn't the team with hammer win around 60% of the time? Seems to me that the top round robin team is richly rewarded for its play.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-10-17 04:13PM
ngm is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ngm Click here to Send ngm a Private Message Find more posts by ngm Add ngm to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ngm
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2011
Location:
Posts: 272

quote:
Originally posted by Longroll
Doesn't the team with the best record in the round robin get hammer in the 1-2 game? And doesn't the team with hammer win around 60% of the time? Seems to me that the top round robin team is richly rewarded for its play.


And they also get first choice of rocks - from any sheet as long as they are the same colour. Another lesser known but possible advantage.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-10-17 06:15PM
drawthepin is offline Click Here to See the Profile for drawthepin Click here to Send drawthepin a Private Message Find more posts by drawthepin Add drawthepin to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
drawthepin
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Feb 2015
Location:
Posts: 42

quote:
Originally posted by curlerbroad
How about do what Sask and AB do - have a triple knockout with ABC...lose three times and you're out whether you are Epping Howard or Tuck.

Sometimes you get the result you might not expect (i.e. SK) but saves tie-breakers, shortens the time etc...



Not really a difference imo. Bottcher went undefeated and qualified out of A. If he loses his next two games, its the exact situation, undefeated until the playoffs.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-10-17 07:57PM
alex is offline Click Here to See the Profile for alex Click here to Send alex a Private Message Find more posts by alex Add alex to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
alex
Hitting Paint

 

Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Quesnel
Posts: 193

Or if he loses the final would have only one loss.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-10-17 10:21PM
IN-OFF-FOR-2 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for IN-OFF-FOR-2 Click here to Send IN-OFF-FOR-2 a Private Message Find more posts by IN-OFF-FOR-2 Add IN-OFF-FOR-2 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
IN-OFF-FOR-2
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Mar 2013
Location:
Posts: 448

non modified triple

By far the best way to get the best team at the end of the day.

Do this for provincials and if the TV dollar rules the Brier and Scotties, do the page there.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

All times are GMT. The time now is . Post New Thread   Post A Reply
Page 2 of 2 -- Go to: ««   | 1 | 2 |   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to thisThread

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

Curling Scores

Click Event to Show Scoreboard
M: Tim Hortons Roar of the Rings
W: Tim Hortons Roar of the Rings
M: Olympic Qualification Event
W: Olympic Qualification Event
M: Farmers Edge SCT
W: BC Scotties Open Event #1
: Dawson Creek Cash Spiel - Challenge
W: KW Granite U18 Girls Spiel
M: BC Mens - Island Playdowns
M: KW Granite U18 Boys Spiel
M: MCT Championships
M: Dawson Creek Cash Spiel - Competitive
W: MCT Championships
M: Crestwood U18 Juvenile Mens Bonspiel
: Crestwood U18 Juvenile Womens Bonspiel
W: Curl Mesabi Classic
M: Curl Mesabi Classic
W: USA Junior National Qualifier 3
Central Time (CT)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

RECENT CURLING POSTS

Recent News

Recent
Kelsey Rocque wins Curl Mesabi Classic

Kelsey Rocque wins Curl Mesabi Classic

Kelsey Rocque (Edmonton, AB) wins the Curl Mesabi Classic, defeating Nina Roth (Blaine, USA) 5-2 at Curl Mesabi in Eveleth, United States.

Curling Blogs

  • CURL WITH MATH: The Quadrennial Canada Olympic...
  • FROM THE HACK: From the Hack Curling Podcast -...
  • MIKE THE CURLING GUY: Olympic Trials Preview -
  • Facebook Feed

    To top ↑