Registered: Jan 2014
Location:
Posts: 110

I have asked for an updated schedule as the original goes back into 2017.
This is TSN for tomorrow.


https://www.tsn.ca/2016-17-curling-...hedule-1.593081

I will get the update and post later.

Happy watching. So happy to see it on TV Again. Check the schedule as it may bounce to Sportsnet as well. I am just getting out to you so you won't miss any tomorrow.

Last edited by Lovemycurling on 01-10-18 at 11:34PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 1120

I've set up my PVR and am going to watching this mornings game between Tirinzone and Homan. Noticed also that curlingzone has not put any results or game schedule up yet. Hmmmmm.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

While they are both outstanding curlers when playing their regular positions of 3rd and 1st stone respectively, neither Miskew or Hebert considers this format to be their strength , particularly Miskew, who has never relished the thought of throwing the last brick, and still doesn't.

Needless to say, Canada could have juggled things and entered instead 3 other powerhouse combos like say, Homan/Nichols, Courtney/Gallant and Weagle/Gushue which would have practically guaranteed 3 wins. Obviously, winning was not that important to North America at this time.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Southern Sask.
Posts: 364

quote:

---

Originally posted by Deliverer
While they are both outstanding curlers when playing their regular positions of 3rd and 1st stone respectively, neither Miskew or Hebert considers this format to be their strength , particularly Miskew, who has never relished the thought of throwing the last brick, and still doesn't.

Needless to say, Canada could have juggled things and entered instead 3 other powerhouse combos like say, Homan/Nichols, Courtney/Gallant and Weagle/Gushue which would have practically guaranteed 3 wins. Obviously, winning was not that important to North America at this time.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

I'm aware that N.A. swept all three mixed double matches today.

That was not the point of my post.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2011
Location:
Posts: 1962

quote:

---

Originally posted by Deliverer
While they are both outstanding curlers when playing their regular positions of 3rd and 1st stone respectively, neither Miskew or Hebert considers this format to be their strength , particularly Miskew, who has never relished the thought of throwing the last brick, and still doesn't.

Needless to say, Canada could have juggled things and entered instead 3 other powerhouse combos like say, Homan/Nichols, Courtney/Gallant and Weagle/Gushue which would have practically guaranteed 3 wins. Obviously, winning was not that important to North America at this time.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2016
Location:
Posts: 471

Hey Decade, enjoyed watching the Mixed Doubles on Friday and was well aware that Benny had agreed to throw last primarily because Emma was not entirely comfortable in that situation.

What I was not aware of, however, was that all of the N.A. and World's participants were actually mandated to play once in the Doubles.

Looking forward now to the Skins on Sunday.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2668

quote:

---

Originally posted by fresca
Contest !!!

win an Acorn !!!

thx to Acorn stairs for sponsoring the curling for 20 years with the same commercial 10,000 times

Guess how many of the old codgers are still in their own homes and win an acorn ...

Guess which one is ML and win an extra acorn !

---

__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged