Like CurlingZone on Facebook
 
 
   
Welcome to CurlingZone, Guest!   Register Now!    
Already a member?   Login:              Forgot Password?
CurlingZone Mobile App Now Free!
Subscribe to The Curling News today!
Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Unregistered
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

quote:
Originally posted by Marc Bernard


Sure, but an Ontario Senior champ and a Tankard skip picking up two guys without patches, although it follows the letter of the rules, is not really in the spirit of the Challenge competition either.

Tankard, Colts and Challenge should each attract teams that "belong" at that level, or are trying to belong at that level.

If the goal is to increase entries, I suspect we'll find more Tankard-level players entering Colts, rather than Challenge-level players playing up.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: 76.71.74.35

Old Post 12-23-12 08:47PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Unregistered
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

quote:
Originally posted by Marc Bernard


If the goal is to increase entries, I suspect we'll find more Tankard-level players entering Colts, rather than Challenge-level players playing up.



Agreed. I think short term you may see an increase in entries, however it may soon just become the second choice for Tankard teams that don't advance. Giving teams two events to enter instead of one, is not increasing overall participation.

Now, other than the Challenge,(which now if you don't have a couple of solid recent juniors on your team you're in pretty tough)what events does the OCA have for the "competetive club" curler?

I think the OCA should be looking at setting up Colts/Trophy more along the lines of of the Dominion. Then you would have an event which solid club teams could enter with a reasonable chance of success.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: 76.71.74.35

Old Post 12-23-12 09:09PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
J-Ho
Super Rockchucker

Registered: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 2404

Great comments here everybody! I've written an article on Colts and it has been put in the most current edition of the OCR. I hope everyone gets a chance to check it out.

JH

__________________
"Good Sliding"!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-23-12 10:32PM
J-Ho is offline Click Here to See the Profile for J-Ho Click here to Send J-Ho a Private Message Find more posts by J-Ho Add J-Ho to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Unregistered
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Rant

I have competed in what looks like my one and only OCA Event this year. Why? Because if you canít commit the time and money to an OCT Team, you canít put together a competitive OCA Team. Iím not knocking the OCT here, but it has created two tiers of curlers in Ontario, and Iím annoyed with the OCA for not recognizing this.

You are either a competitive curler and commit time and money to OCT events, or you are a club curler. From my point of view the ďcompetitive clubĒ curler is dead. Most OCT Teams are put together with members from across the province, who, in many cases, other than being OCA competitive members donít even belong to a club, or if they do, itís not the same club. This is fine if youíre putting together a team for OCT events, or any event leading to a National, but I have a problem with the other OCA events.

I could be wrong, and Iím sure Iíll be corrected if I am, but is not the purpose of the OCA to support and promote curling and curling clubs in Ontario? In their efforts to increase participation in their events, to help cover their expenses, they have killed the ďcompetitive clubĒ curler. If they are going set up all the OCA events so that all OCT teams are fully eligible to enter, then why have two separate organizations?

The OCA should be implementing rules for all events that donít lead to a national, that support and promote the ďcompetitive clubĒ curler. I donít see any point in the time and expense of running additional events for OCT teams. For all OCA events that donít lead to a National, I think all team members should be FULL members of the SAME club.

If the OCA wants to increase participation, they have to set up events for the competitive CLUB curler. Otherwise, they can continue to watch participation decline, until it is only the top twenty or so OCT teams entering their events province wide.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: 76.71.74.35

Old Post 01-01-13 06:13PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Unregistered
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

An excellent analysis of the trend that began when the WCT created the slam events. And the true fault lies not with your OCT/OCA, but with the CCA, WCT & WCPA.

The CCA has stood back and allowed the WCT & WCPA to create the illusion that there are only a select few good teams in our country. Now very few competitive club players see through this ruse.

It has been accomplished through a grandfathering points system, federal funding for a select few and a curling media that fawns over these teams while creating a myth of invincibility that has turned people off of entering playdowns.

Club memberships, while down across the country, have not dropped in relationship to playdowns participation. People have swallowed this myth whole-to the ultimate detriment of our sport.

Instead of creating large junior club programs with development instruction for all, we have 'high-performance' camps for the privileged, select few chosen not always for their skill, but often because they are well liked.

Our greatest strength as a game has always been the statement that on any given day, any team can beat any other team. While we probably cannot return to the days of club playdowns leading to nationals, we can promote and bring this truth back to the forefront. And , perhaps, it might rekindle the dreams of the competitive club players-because they are still out there.

If not, we will continue this slide and become a sport of the rich and select few-like Europe. We will end up not a sport for all, but a sport of snobs.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: 209.121.225.160

Old Post 01-01-13 07:57PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlerbroad
Super Rockchucker

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1395

Excellent points. I think a good survey needs to be done across the OCA clubs with the assurance that the OCA will not use those numbers to increase fees etc...there is no clear picture on numbers.

But doing a quick glance at participation levels - Junior entries are way down...the canary in the coal mine? This is what the OCA and the CCA needs to be concerned about. Focus on the recreational curler. Maybe a survey of how bonspiels are doing. Some are cancelled, some have drop to just one draw, many are not full.

I agree that if an event does not lead to a national championship then yes more stringent rules should apply.

__________________
Well Behaved Women Don't Make History.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-02-13 11:11AM
curlerbroad is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlerbroad Click here to Send curlerbroad a Private Message Find more posts by curlerbroad Add curlerbroad to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Guest
Super Rockchucker

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: .
Posts: 1688

Why don't we wait and see how the removal of Colts eligibility affects the entries for Colts this year. I do not expect to see a huge influx of exclusive OCT teams into Colts or other OCA events not leading to a national championship.

__________________
Guest

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 01-03-13 11:22AM
Guest is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Guest Click here to Send Guest a Private Message Visit Guest's homepage! Find more posts by Guest Add Guest to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Unregistered
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

And I do not expect to see an influx of entries in OCA events in general.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: 76.71.74.35

Old Post 01-03-13 09:45PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Guest
Super Rockchucker

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: .
Posts: 1688

Thumbs up Blast from the past

So how did the new OCA Colts criteria, i.e. no criteria, affect this years entries:

Zone - #Entries

1 - 1
2 - 3
3 - 5
4 - 3
5 - 3
6 - 8
7 - 9
8 - 10
9 - 9
10 - 4
11 - 4
12 - 7
13 - 13
14 - 6
15 - 9
16 - 7

Total: 100 entries

Don't know last years numbers but I think it was a good move to get more entries

Congrats to the eventual winner Richard Krell (K-W Granite)

__________________
Guest

Last edited by Guest on 04-27-13 at 01:44PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-27-13 01:41PM
Guest is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Guest Click here to Send Guest a Private Message Visit Guest's homepage! Find more posts by Guest Add Guest to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Second
Harvey Hacksmasher

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario
Posts: 24

Just bringing this back because I miss J-Ho.

My math is a little different from Guest's, but here we go.

For Colts the entries are: this year 92 plus Zone 2 which isn't posted yet, and last year 106. The OCA doesn't post actual numbers for prior years, just the difference, being: 2012 -2, 2011 -6, 2010 +1.

For comparison I also looked at the Challenge, the numbers are: 2014 91, 2013 107, 2012 +2,2011 -22, 2010 -24.I speculate the reason for the big drop in 2010 & 2011, has something to do with relaxing the Challenge rules in 2009, so that Junior patches no longer count.

It's obvious entries are still declining not only in Colts, but all OCA events.

The way to increase participation is to make more events appeal to club teams. If the purpose of these events is to introduce curlers to competative curling, then they need to cater to those teams.One way to do this is to restrict the entry requirements, not eliminate them. I've heard the same comments numerous times about teams, that the players have never been in the clubs they're representing, and are made up of players from 3 or 4 different clubs.I agree,that for events not leading to a National, teams should be restricted to players who are full members of the same club.Then maybe the competative curlers will start getting other players from thier clubs to enter these events with, instead of just teaming up with thier buddies they've known since juniors to go for a party at provincials.

The competative curlers have to recognize that if paticipation continues to decline, in the future, instead of a having a great time at Provincials on the OCA's tab at these events,the events won't exist due to lack of interest and support.

__________________
Skips can't sweep!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-17-14 09:28PM
Second is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Second Click here to Send Second a Private Message Find more posts by Second Add Second to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
dugless_13
Harvey Hacksmasher

Registered: Dec 2008
Location: 1994 Lumina Dr
Posts: 87

quote:
teams should be restricted to players who are full members of the same club.


This Idea has been brought up before but the OCA does not have the jurisdiction to dictate club policy to its member clubs. A rule like that would be up a club board to put in place and with dwindling memberships many clubs are willing to let players take out " associate memberships" that allow them to play an event without actually ever playing in the club, Clubs need the revenue. I know, as an example, that our club once required all players representing the club at an OCA event to play in at least one of our leagues, but that rule has changed. We need the cash.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 02-18-14 08:49AM
dugless_13 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dugless_13 Click here to Send dugless_13 a Private Message Find more posts by dugless_13 Add dugless_13 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is . Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Championship
Click Event to Show Scoreboard
M: Players' Championship
W: Players' Championship
M: Players' Championship
Summerside, PEI
MENU: Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Apr 20 -- 4:00pm ET
Martin, K
Jacobs, B
4
3
Final
(8)
Eastern Time (ET)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

MOST RECENT CZ FORUM POSTS

Manitoba Curling
New Teams and Rumours???? ( 1 2 3 4 ... Last page )
Rock Talk
Martin Speaks: Surprised nobody else retired
Rock Talk
Sportsnet Grand Slam of Curling
Manitoba Curling
2nd CTRS Spot
U.S.A. Curling
Mixed Doubles Worlds
Rock Talk
The end of the Brier as we know? ( 1 2 3 )
Rock Talk
Big Changes Coming? ( 1 2 3 4 ... Last page )
Rock Talk
Why is interest in curling falling? ( 1 2 )
BC Curling
Island represent!! ( 1 2 )
Players/Teams Classifieds
Competivie Men's Team Nova Scotia
U.S.A. Curling
Governance Issues
Rock Talk
Where does Jennifer Jones rank now? ( 1 2 )
Rock Talk
Kevin Martin retires; Joins Broadcast team: Slams expanding to 5!
Rock Talk
Free House Rule
Ontario Curling
2014 Durham Eastern Major League
Rock Talk
numbers players are wearing at Grand Slam
Rock Talk
Nichols to Gushue
Rock Talk
2014 Glenn Howard Curling Camp, yes? no???
World Curling Tour
The Players: Summerside (Womens) ( 1 2 3 )
World Curling Tour
Martin vs. Jacobs (last game for Bear)
Rock Talk
Players Championship - Men
Rock Talk
What is Sportsnet doing? ( 1 2 )
U.S.A. Curling
High Performance Program ( 1 2 )
U.S.A. Curling
FL in 2016, where in 2015?
U.S.A. Curling
Kentucky Derby
Saskatchewan Curling
New teams for 2014/2015
Rock Talk
Putting bums in the seats....... ( 1 2 )
Rock Talk
Not Breaking Up - Team JJ
Rock Talk
Ottawa Curling Club Considering American Ice Maker?
Playdowns
2014 World Mixed Doubles ( 1 2 )
Rock Talk
Problems with new curling shoes
Rock Talk
European Masters
U.S.A. Curling
The Chosen 16
Playdowns
2014 Mens World Championship ( 1 2 3 4 ... Last page )
Playdowns
the "who's who at this years Player's Championships
U.S.A. Curling
U-18
Playdowns
Koe front end
Playdowns
Homan blow up or Koe blow up, which is worse?
Rock Talk
What should be the future of residency rules for elite curlers in Canada? ( 1 2 3 4 )
Rock Talk
Breakout Curling Stars 2015
Rock Talk
Koe Can't Win Gold?
Playdowns
TOP SKIP - Reality Show
U.S.A. Curling
World Men's 2014 ( 1 2 3 4 )
Playdowns
HELP! Need Video of 1-2 Game Mens Worlds
Playdowns
streaming SF
U.S.A. Curling
Curling in the good ol' US of A.
Playdowns
2014 Brier ( 1 2 3 4 ... Last page )
Rock Talk
Kreviazuk Question
Asia-Pacific Curling
Southern Hemisphere
Rock Talk
CZ Chat - how do I turn it off
Post New Message  |  View All Forums

FANTASY PICK'EM

Player Photo
Makichuk, Lindsay
  Player Photo
Kaufman, Jessie
October 18 -- 2:00 pm EDT
Click to Pick the Winner!
Who do you thi