Forums Menu

User: 
Pass:  

Curling Scores

M: Canadian Mixed Doubles Curling Championship
Fredericton, NB
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 6 -- Mon, Mar 18 -- 7:00pm AT
Gagn/Mori Final
Rees/Ches (EE)
Sand/Crai Final
Gamb/Kalt (8)
Arms/Grif Final
Pete/Gall (7) Watch Live Curling!
Zhen/Piet Final
Gion/Desj (7)
Wasy/Koni Final
Jone/Lain (EE)
Wise/Smit 12  Final
Weag/Eppi (6)
Lott/Lott 12  Final
Bouc/Char (7)
Krev/Math Final
Whit/Whit (6)
M: Aberdeen International Curling Championship
Aberdeen, SCO
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 2:45pm GMT
Mouat Final
Shuster (7)
W: Biktrix Saskatchewan Senior Women's Curling Championship
Martensville, SK
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 3:00pm MT
Foster Final
Streifel (8) Watch Live Curling!
W: CCAA / Curling Canada College Championships
Sudbury, ON
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sat, Mar 16 -- 2:30pm AT
Southern Alberta IoT Final
Concordia U (10)
UofA - Augustana Final
Humber College (10)
D: WCT Slovakia Mixed Doubles Cup II
Bratislava, SVK
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 12:00pm CET
Han/Zou Final
Paul/Paul (7)
Cihl/Mace Final
Yang/Tian 10  (6)
: NWTCA Mixed
Yellowknife, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 4 -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 10:00am MT
Delorey Final
Koe (5)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  
Disclaimer: CurlingZone does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any Content posted on any Forums area and you acknowledge that any reliance upon such Content shall be at your sole risk. Any Content placed on any Forums area by users and anonymous posters are the views of the user posting the statement, and do not represent the views of CurlingZone or our partners, advertisers or sponsors. By posting anonymously, you are allowing your IP address to be displayed for identification purposes. CurlingZone reserves the right to remove any post at its discretion without warning or explanation.
Page 1 of 2 -- Go to: | 1 | 2 | »»   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread   Post A Reply
02-19-17 01:39PM
tuck is offline Click Here to See the Profile for tuck Click here to Send tuck a Private Message Find more posts by tuck Add tuck to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
tuck
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: St. Thomas, North Dakota
Posts: 2613

Olympic Trials Team Selection

The main fallout from the Seattle Nationals will be who gets invited to The Trials in Omaha. They take place in early November, so I'm dead certain the discussion has begun amongst the decision makers.

First will come the timing of the selections. This is an important decision.

Some could argue for a decision coming very, very soon. The fields could be set (or mostly set) right after the completion of Worlds. Those people would be arguing for selections to be made right before Easter. This would allow for training curlers through the summer; particularly off-ice conditioning, sports psychiatry and strategy session...maybe some throwing on Blaine's summer ice and advancing our ability to pair rocks.

Others will argue to put off the selections process. They could argue that we run the risk of looking supremely stupid if we leave out a team that gets red hot in September/October. Imagine that we pick 4 Men's and 4 Women's teams in April (so that we can focus offseason training on them). Then imagine that a good team (like Cassie or Fenson) do very well in September and then cash in a Slam or two. Dang. We'd look uberstupid if they weren't curling in Omaha.

So I imagine that it will come down to a mix of both options. They will name some teams (like Shuster and Sinclair) right away while saving a spot or two for their late selection.

I'm guessing, but I think they will end up with 4 teams in each gender. I'm also guessing that they will include 6 Men's teams and 4 Women's teams in offseason training. My guess is that they'll name 3 teams now and announce that late picks remain at their option.

For the Men, the only lock is Face Shuster. I'm thinking that the second pick will be Brady. They have little justification for not putting Brady over the other HPP teams when The Brady Bunch finished higher in consecutive Nationals.

The third Men's pick gets a little tricky. I believe it should be Heath McCormick. I think Heater is an exceptional talent from whom we have yet to figure out how to tap. Along those lines, I'm not certain that I'd leave Heater's team intact. I think all of his front three are excellent curlers. I'm just not sure if Heater needs different components to get him to his peak.

Craig Brown continues to be quietly competitive at the highest levels. Last year they were overshadowed by Face's historic year. This year they never caught up to Heater's fast start. With consecutive disappointing results at Nationals, it would be hard to make a case for the Top 3. (disappointing for a team of their talent and work ethic...those same results would be thrilling for the vast majority of teams and curlers)

Boo Boo Birr is kicking down the door. How good were Vanilla Ice and Dr. Double last week? Impressive. Still, it's hard to move them ahead of The Brady Bunch...but there is an argument to made that they've earned a spot ahead of Heater and Brownie. I'm not there yet. Where I am is: How do you lock them out this early? If they set the field and then these guys win the Shorty Jenkins (entirely possible), we'll look like idiots. Too good to lock out in April. So is Brown. So is Brady.

I was also impressed by Team Fenson's front three. Pete wasn't the Pete that once ruled swingy ice, but he's still Pete Fenson and he's got a good front end.

Decisions will be made soon. Maybe just the decision on when to make the decisions; but maybe all of the decisions.

Women's next.

Ben Tucker

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 05:55PM
fanofcurling is offline Click Here to See the Profile for fanofcurling Click here to Send fanofcurling a Private Message Find more posts by fanofcurling Add fanofcurling to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
fanofcurling
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 81

Oh, I plan to chime in on this topic a few times. First, the selection criteria... When I saw the criteria last Fall, I thought, maybe no one will achieve it! IF, the men's and women's teams don't finish 5th or better that means ALL teams in the trials will be "discretionary selection". Makes no sense!

The selection committee has a chance to breath life back into USA competitive curling by selecting both a men's and a women's team that is not in the HP Program for the Trials. Don't be afraid they might win. (heavy sigh)

I don't know how Clark could be excluded!!!

more later...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 05:58PM
KiwiCurl is offline Click Here to See the Profile for KiwiCurl Click here to Send KiwiCurl a Private Message Find more posts by KiwiCurl Add KiwiCurl to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
KiwiCurl
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Auckland
Posts: 13

(getting popcorn...)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 06:18PM
Alice is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Alice Click here to Send Alice a Private Message Find more posts by Alice Add Alice to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Alice
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2012
Location:
Posts: 324

After worlds for adults and juniors, the HPP staff and other USCA decision makers will publish a qualifications update by July 1 with enough wiggle room to put in their favorites, epecially any new teams formed by HPP after an invitation-only camp. They will not trust any new hot team which cashes in early next season since they think they know best how to manufacture and pick a team to Peak At the Right Time instead of skips and coaches not under HPP management.

If the HPP junior teams now at junior worlds do well, I predict the wiggle room will be used to get them into the Trials - at least for them to "have that experience" which - bonus! - will keep out any self-formed adult hot team from the outback.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 06:20PM
tuck is offline Click Here to See the Profile for tuck Click here to Send tuck a Private Message Find more posts by tuck Add tuck to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
tuck
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: St. Thomas, North Dakota
Posts: 2613

I agree, Fan Of Curling. I don't see how you'd put The Brady Bunch lower than second and most certainly not out in the cold. The bigger question is: When will they make their picks? Oh...and the "win it on the ice" stuff is being more and more exposed as crap.

Women's:

First they will have to wait until Worlds is over. Then they will have to check with the HPP teams to make dead-certain that the chemistry on all three of those teams remain good.

Like Boo Boo for the Men's, Cassie is trying to kick down the door and force her way into Omaha. I'd be very hesitant to lock that door too soon. She's a force. She could win something big and then we'd look dumb when she isn't in The Trials.

Is Cassie's front end good enough for the Olympics? Jackie, Sophie and Steph are all very good, but did you get the feeling that they were a small step below the other top front ends? I did, but it's just a gut feeling. They played well. I don't know. Maybe, with a second year together, those three will the best of the front ends. Maybe not. If I was coaching them, I think I'd advise them to bring in a shooter as a fifth. Maybe Courtney George if the Jessica Shultz team breaks up or maybe Jessica herself. Where is Tara Petersen?

Anyway; I don't see how you exclude any of the three HPP teams from Omaha. I don't see any reason not to include Team Shultz and Team Potter from summer training if they wish to participate and leave the door open for one of these new teams to show improvement early next year. I see the upside to naming the teams early (offseason training and focused budgeting), but what's the downside to leaving the door open for a team or two that put in time/effort/money outside of the HPP with some success?

Ben Tucker

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 07:18PM
Alice is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Alice Click here to Send Alice a Private Message Find more posts by Alice Add Alice to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Alice
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2012
Location:
Posts: 324

Just so we know all the key variables in this discussion, how many curlers can Team USA bring to the S. Korea Games if we qualify for mens, womens and mixed doubles? Does IOC limit the number of team alternates? Is the mixed team expected to serve alternate duty for mens and womens? If so that limits the raw number of Olympian curlers. I seem to remember mixed doubles got in the Olympics because it needed no more ice, no more support staffers, and no new large number of athletes to house besides the feel-good vibe of maybe getting "new" curling countries on Olympic TV.

Last edited by Alice on 02-19-17 at 07:20PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 07:24PM
KiwiCurl is offline Click Here to See the Profile for KiwiCurl Click here to Send KiwiCurl a Private Message Find more posts by KiwiCurl Add KiwiCurl to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
KiwiCurl
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Auckland
Posts: 13

Max athletes any country (that qualifies) can send to Olympics is 12:

- Mens team (5)
- Womens team (5)
- Mixed Doubles team (2)

No alternates for the Mixed Doubles team.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 07:33PM
KiwiCurl is offline Click Here to See the Profile for KiwiCurl Click here to Send KiwiCurl a Private Message Find more posts by KiwiCurl Add KiwiCurl to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
KiwiCurl
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Auckland
Posts: 13

...and the Mixed Doubles event doesn't overlap with the Men's/Women's event...so it's theoretically possible that an athlete could compete in both Mixed Doubles, and in Men's / Women's... although most nations in contention appear to be discouraging that thought.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 07:52PM
Alice is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Alice Click here to Send Alice a Private Message Find more posts by Alice Add Alice to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Alice
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2012
Location:
Posts: 324

Thanks, Kiwi.

How soon must each country name and lock in their mixed team? No last minute subs possible in mixed once the torch is lit?

Will mens and womens be simultaneous with mixed before or after those events?

Aren't the Clarks the US curlers with the most on-ice success in both mixed and mens/womens events?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 08:04PM
KiwiCurl is offline Click Here to See the Profile for KiwiCurl Click here to Send KiwiCurl a Private Message Find more posts by KiwiCurl Add KiwiCurl to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
KiwiCurl
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Oct 2016
Location: Auckland
Posts: 13

Not sure about the exact drop dead date, but the Olympic Qualification event ends Dec 10 so likely not too long after that. The MD event will be played first, completed, then the Mens/Womens event. I don't think there could be 'last minute' subs - wouldn't be fair to a nation that qualified in MD but not in Mens/Womens.

For the US the athletes likeliest to be affected by this are Joe Polo and Tab Peterson. For Canada, John Morris and Rachel Homan. Both countries have ways to qualify their teams in both disciplines - and pretty tough routes for either.

The vision for MD is developing its own personality and specialists. Its like the 15 man game in rugby, vs the Rugby 7s that was played at Olympics. Same field, same ball, but you need entirely different sets of playing skills.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-19-17 08:28PM
fanofcurling is offline Click Here to See the Profile for fanofcurling Click here to Send fanofcurling a Private Message Find more posts by fanofcurling Add fanofcurling to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
fanofcurling
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 81

quote:
Originally posted by tuck


Women's:


Is Cassie's front end good enough for the Olympics? Jackie, Sophie and Steph are all very good, but did you get the feeling that they were a small step below the other top front ends? I did, but it's just a gut feeling. They played well. I don't know. Maybe, with a second year together, those three will the best of the front ends. Maybe not. If I was coaching them, I think I'd advise them to bring in a shooter as a fifth. Maybe Courtney George if the Jessica Shultz team breaks up or maybe Jessica herself. Where is Tara Petersen?

Ben Tucker



Potter has beaten Sinclair two out of the last three times they faced each other. Potter has beaten Christensen the last two times they have faced each other.

They were 5-0 at Nationals when they lost their lead to illness for two games. By the time she was well enough to play in the semi-finals the team appeared to have lost the momentum and rhythm they had earlier in the competition (not an excuse, but something that happens to all teams).

The advantage the HP teams have over Potter is mooney. Maybe talent, but prove it on the ice. An olympic trials with the three HPP plus Schultz and Potter would be what most people would want to see.

Schultz struggled at Nationals, but so did McCormick.......

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-20-17 12:17AM
Alice is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Alice Click here to Send Alice a Private Message Find more posts by Alice Add Alice to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Alice
Swing Artist

 

Registered: Feb 2012
Location:
Posts: 324

Thanks for the info, Kiwi! That simpilfies some things.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 01:27PM
AlanMacNeill is offline Click Here to See the Profile for AlanMacNeill Click here to Send AlanMacNeill a Private Message Find more posts by AlanMacNeill Add AlanMacNeill to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AlanMacNeill
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 1064

How many teams can be invited to trials? I know it's at least 4...but is 8 an option? Or 6? Or is it just 4 each?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 01:39PM
curlky is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlky Click here to Send curlky a Private Message Find more posts by curlky Add curlky to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlky
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Oct 2013
Location:
Posts: 559

quote:
Originally posted by AlanMacNeill
How many teams can be invited to trials? I know it's at least 4...but is 8 an option? Or 6? Or is it just 4 each?


I believe the answer is 3 to 5 teams will compete. And I don't think that is random, I believe the standard calls for 3 to 5.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 02:56PM
curlky is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlky Click here to Send curlky a Private Message Find more posts by curlky Add curlky to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlky
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Oct 2013
Location:
Posts: 559

More details for alan

The field will be a minimum of three (3) teams and a maximum of five (5) teams each for men and women. The final procedures are currently being drafted in consultation with the United States Olympic Committee, and are still to be finalized. The draft includes the following proposals on how teams can qualify for the Trials:
A - One team can qualify for the Trials by placing in the top 5 at the 2017 World Championships
B - One team can qualify for the Trials by placing in the top 15 on the World Curling Tour (WCT) Order of Merit (OOM)at the end of season 2016-17 (2 year OOM standings)
C - One team can qualify for the Trials by placing in the top 15 on the WCT OOM Year to Date (YTD) at the end of season 2016-17 (OOM for just this ice season only)
D - The Selection Committee can add discretionary selections in the best interests of international competitive excellence. The Selection Committee reserves the right not to add any discretionary selections if they feel it is in the best interests of international competitive excellence. Discretionary selection criteria will include but not be limited to international performances and results achieved during the 2015-16 and 2016-17 seasons.

Who that can apply to
A - Shuster / Roth
B - Shuster is currently 14th, Brown is 25th, so on Mens side only Shuster has a real chance. Roth is highet on women at 26, so doubtful any women's team would qualify this way.
C - McCormick 17, Shuster 24, Brown 26, so all 3 with some amount of chance, but not a given for anyone. Roth 15 Sinclair 27, so Roth in good position there.
D - Who knows what their thought process is

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 03:02PM
AlanMacNeill is offline Click Here to See the Profile for AlanMacNeill Click here to Send AlanMacNeill a Private Message Find more posts by AlanMacNeill Add AlanMacNeill to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AlanMacNeill
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Sep 2011
Location:
Posts: 1064

Wow...so...under those rules...*IF* Shuster were to place bottom five at Worlds, then the HPP is choosing all of the teams (assuming Shuster would drop 2 places in the OOM by then...not actually guaranteed...but possible).

That's...asinine.

I note they are draft's, so hopefully the USOC noticed that and vetoed it...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 03:11PM
MCC_PE is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MCC_PE Click here to Send MCC_PE a Private Message Find more posts by MCC_PE Add MCC_PE to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MCC_PE
Hitting Paint

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 140

U.S. Curling Association Athlete Selection Procedures Olympic Games 2018 are posted here, and don't look like draft procedures:
http://www.teamusa.org/-/media/USA_...8BCD19D63D2ED99

Shuster and Sinclair can still earn points in the Champions Cup to better their chances, but Sinclair would likely need a deep playoff run as she's 36± points out of 15th place. McCormick, sitting at 17 YTD OOM as noted above, might be able to get into a GSOC event or two, because the Elite 10 is based on top 10 YTD OOM and Players Championship top 12, but need a number of teams to decline invites. Same with Roth.

That being said, although I'm rooting for teams to qualify, it would be surprising if anyone besides Roth and Shuster automatically qualifies. There's a good chance everyone else will be discretionary selections.

Also, according to the selection procedures, "Discretionary Selection of any teams to participate in trials will take place by May 15th, 2017."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 03:27PM
fanofcurling is offline Click Here to See the Profile for fanofcurling Click here to Send fanofcurling a Private Message Find more posts by fanofcurling Add fanofcurling to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
fanofcurling
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 81

So let's assume nobody qualifies...

On the men's side, the selection committee will first pick the three HPP teams:
1. Shuster
2. McCormick
3. Brown

Then they HAVE to pick the 2016 National Champion and 2017 Bronze medalist.

4. Brady Clark

On the outside looking in are:

5. Birr
6. Fenson

With the Criteria set out by the Selection Committee, I don't see how they let Birr and Fenson in.

On the women's side, the selection committee will first pick the three HPP teams:
1. Roth
2. Sinclair
3. Christensen

On the outside looking in are:
4. Potter
5. Schultz

They gotta have four teams! Come on!

Thoughts from others?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 04:17PM
curlky is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlky Click here to Send curlky a Private Message Find more posts by curlky Add curlky to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlky
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Oct 2013
Location:
Posts: 559

I would vote that it will be
Shuster
Brown
Clark
Birr

Sinclair
Roth
Christensen
Potter (maybe I would give 50-50 shot)

So I leave out HPP McCormick.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 05:00PM
biterbar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for biterbar Click here to Send biterbar a Private Message Find more posts by biterbar Add biterbar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
biterbar
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695

quote:
Originally posted by curlky
I would vote that it will be
Shuster
Brown
Clark
Birr

Sinclair
Roth
Christensen
Potter (maybe I would give 50-50 shot)

So I leave out HPP McCormick.



I agree.

Are we all assuming the HP teams will not be shuffled?

Can they at this point?

__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 07:23PM
curlinglove is offline Click Here to See the Profile for curlinglove Find more posts by curlinglove Add curlinglove to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
curlinglove
Harvey Hacksmasher

 

Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 58

I would assume they will not adjust teams at this point.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 08:22PM
tuck is offline Click Here to See the Profile for tuck Click here to Send tuck a Private Message Find more posts by tuck Add tuck to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
tuck
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: St. Thomas, North Dakota
Posts: 2613

I'm assuming that the HPP teams can be shuffled. They can be shuffled at any time; even in the middle of Worlds to a certain extent. Which begs the question: Why is Joe Cool Polo on the bench? I'm not sure where I'd put him, but I'd have him playing.

Kentucky leaving Heater out for the time being??? We seem destined to disagree; but that's OK.

Ben Tucker

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 09:09PM
VAcurler is offline Click Here to See the Profile for VAcurler Click here to Send VAcurler a Private Message Find more posts by VAcurler Add VAcurler to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
VAcurler
Hitting Paint

 

Registered: Jan 2012
Location:
Posts: 136

Anyone offering odds on Clark getting an invite? I think they'll be on the outside looking in unless the entire team moves to Blaine in the next 2 months.

If the HPP program wanted to have outsiders they would have given credit for winning Nationals and not doing well at Worlds. Imagine if Clark had won again this year but Heater was going to Worlds instead of them.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-21-17 10:52PM
tuck is offline Click Here to See the Profile for tuck Click here to Send tuck a Private Message Find more posts by tuck Add tuck to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
tuck
Super Rockchucker

 

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: St. Thomas, North Dakota
Posts: 2613

I'd wager a cocktail on the Brady Bunch getting an invite. Who else (besides Shuster) can you put ahead of them? Gold and bronze and a decent point total; how could they be left out? I'll take that bet.

As for "imagining" Clark winning gold twice and twice not going to Worlds; I'd rather not imagine that, if you don't mind.

Nice discussion.

Ben Tucker

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

02-22-17 09:25AM
biterbar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for biterbar Click here to Send biterbar a Private Message Find more posts by biterbar Add biterbar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
biterbar
Drawmaster

 

Registered: Mar 2009
Location:
Posts: 695

I agree with Tuck, Brady HAS to in.

A couple years ago Roth wins but doesn't go to worlds, this year she come in second and does? Can this get any more effed up?

__________________
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"-Winston Churchill

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

All times are GMT. The time now is . Post New Thread   Post A Reply
Page 1 of 2 -- Go to: | 1 | 2 | »»   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to thisThread

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

Curling Scores

M: Canadian Mixed Doubles Curling Championship
Fredericton, NB
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 6 -- Mon, Mar 18 -- 7:00pm AT
Gagn/Mori Final
Rees/Ches (EE)
Sand/Crai Final
Gamb/Kalt (8)
Arms/Grif Final
Pete/Gall (7) Watch Live Curling!
Zhen/Piet Final
Gion/Desj (7)
Wasy/Koni Final
Jone/Lain (EE)
Wise/Smit 12  Final
Weag/Eppi (6)
Lott/Lott 12  Final
Bouc/Char (7)
Krev/Math Final
Whit/Whit (6)
M: Aberdeen International Curling Championship
Aberdeen, SCO
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 2:45pm GMT
Mouat Final
Shuster (7)
D: WCT Slovakia Mixed Doubles Cup II
Bratislava, SVK
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: CF -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 12:00pm CET
Han/Zou Final
Paul/Paul (7)
Cihl/Mace Final
Yang/Tian 10  (6)
: NWTCA Mixed
Yellowknife, NT
Teams | Scores | Standings | Playoffs
Draw: 4 -- Sun, Mar 17 -- 10:00am MT
Delorey Final
Koe (5)
Full Scoreboard  |  Play Fantasy Pick'em!  

Recent News

Recent
Canadian mixed doubles championship starts in Fredericton on Sunday

Canadian mixed doubles championship starts in Fredericton on Sunday

Marlee Powers and Luke Saunders of Halifax, Nova Scotia won 6-5 over Papley/van Amsterdam in the opening draw streamed on Curling Canada's Plus platform.

Curling Photos

Recent

Curling Blogs

Facebook Feed

Twitter Feed

To top ↑